(no subject)
Mar. 10th, 2018 02:12 pmSo I just finished Nicole Kornher-Stace's Archivist Wasp, which I had told myself going in was almost certainly not going to be a book which had anything to do with actual archives, and indeed about this I was correct: this is set in a post-apocalyptic future in which Archivist is a ritual title for a teen girl priestess/sacrifice who hunts ghosts and records observations about them in various notebooks which are never seen by anyone until she is killed by the next Archivist-to-be in ritual combat.
(Wistfully, I asked the book: but do the notebooks have metadata even? An index? A finding aid? No, apparently just twenty notebooks of disconnected jotted observations. FIELD RESEARCHER WASP.)
Anyway the actual plot of the book isn't even about the notebooks, it's about our Archivist heroine making a deal with a particularly coherent ghost to go to the underworld and find the ghost of his former partner from a time pre(?)-(or during(?))-apocalypse when they were the last surviving human experiments from a terrible superweapon facility. All of which is fine if a little disconnected, and it takes quite a long while for the journey to wend back into relevant non-underworld plot developments for Wasp, but if you enjoy stories about traumatized human weapons reluctantly bonding with each other under stressed-out questing circumstances and don't mind a fair degree of bleakness this might be your jam.
However, I can't stop thinking about the hilarious co-opting of my job title to mean 'tragic ghost hunter.' There are a lot of archivists in fiction whose day-to-day work bears very little resemblance to my own, because not many people actually care about what archivists do and definitely nobody cares about what digital archivists do (except the people who wrote Rogue One, who understood PERFECTLY, thank you Star Wars franchise) but this is probably the most dramatic example. Which is fine! Words can mean anything in the post-apocalypse! It's just also ... very distracting ......
What about you guys? Tell me about the fictional character with the same job title as you whose job least resembles yours!
(Wistfully, I asked the book: but do the notebooks have metadata even? An index? A finding aid? No, apparently just twenty notebooks of disconnected jotted observations. FIELD RESEARCHER WASP.)
Anyway the actual plot of the book isn't even about the notebooks, it's about our Archivist heroine making a deal with a particularly coherent ghost to go to the underworld and find the ghost of his former partner from a time pre(?)-(or during(?))-apocalypse when they were the last surviving human experiments from a terrible superweapon facility. All of which is fine if a little disconnected, and it takes quite a long while for the journey to wend back into relevant non-underworld plot developments for Wasp, but if you enjoy stories about traumatized human weapons reluctantly bonding with each other under stressed-out questing circumstances and don't mind a fair degree of bleakness this might be your jam.
However, I can't stop thinking about the hilarious co-opting of my job title to mean 'tragic ghost hunter.' There are a lot of archivists in fiction whose day-to-day work bears very little resemblance to my own, because not many people actually care about what archivists do and definitely nobody cares about what digital archivists do (except the people who wrote Rogue One, who understood PERFECTLY, thank you Star Wars franchise) but this is probably the most dramatic example. Which is fine! Words can mean anything in the post-apocalypse! It's just also ... very distracting ......
What about you guys? Tell me about the fictional character with the same job title as you whose job least resembles yours!
no subject
Date: 2018-03-10 07:21 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2018-03-10 07:25 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2018-03-10 08:30 pm (UTC)(Actual translation and especially interpreting in sff, of course, being mostly handled by handwavium in the form of magic/universal translators/convenient field effects, about which I am dubious as a translator and "¯\_(ツ)_/¯ I mean it's often handy!" as a writer and reader and viewer.)
Anyway in conclusion I am proud if confused to be dating a tragic ghost hunter and I have all kinds of new questions about what you folks get up to in your 9-5 ghost hunter workdays at the office.
no subject
Date: 2018-03-10 08:45 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2018-03-10 09:24 pm (UTC)Slight tangent: A Russian colleague once told me that during communism in the USSR, there were propaganda movies with female mathematicians or physicists as heroes, to encourage women to go into science. Would love to see one of those movies!
Oh, and also: is there fic about the archivists on Scarif?
no subject
Date: 2018-03-10 09:31 pm (UTC)I loved this novel precisely because it is a katabatic road trip with fucked-up ghosts. I read it half in a bookstore and half in a library and refuse to feel like I missed the point of bookstores and libraries just because I brought my own copy in with me. (It was a day with a lot of waiting.)
no subject
Date: 2018-03-10 11:26 pm (UTC)I was going to go with Hari Seldon from the Foundation series as mathematician whose job is least like mine -- I'm entirely unclear as to why his job title is "Professor of Mathematics" when he is clearly a mathematical social scientist (the prequel makes it clear that's what he's been doing from a young age), and he should at a minimum have a joint appointment with some other department.
I mean, really, what would it be like to have Hari Seldon as your calculus prof? "Today we are going to study dynamical systems. Here's a toy model of the evolution of the Galactic Empire. As you can see, it's doomed."
no subject
Date: 2018-03-10 11:38 pm (UTC)....oooh, sold.
no subject
Date: 2018-03-10 11:38 pm (UTC)Definitely sold!
no subject
Date: 2018-03-11 12:32 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2018-03-11 01:34 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2018-03-11 01:51 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2018-03-11 02:50 am (UTC)https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=L7k9Gvx-XjM
no subject
Date: 2018-03-11 03:16 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2018-03-11 03:25 am (UTC)I mean I WISH I could be Donna from Suits based on what I know about her from fanfic, but that's really never going to happen.
no subject
Date: 2018-03-11 04:14 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2018-03-11 04:17 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2018-03-11 04:35 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2018-03-11 06:13 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2018-03-11 07:09 am (UTC)It's not without its problems, and I recognize it may not be close enough, but I can get you a heroic female astronomer in Fritz Lang's Frau im Mond (Woman in the Moon, 1929).
no subject
Date: 2018-03-11 07:27 am (UTC)Also too much fixing other people's code has given me a strong dislike of "clever" code as opposed to straightforward and readable.
no subject
Date: 2018-03-11 07:34 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2018-03-11 09:06 am (UTC)There's Barbara Wilson's detective Cassandra Reilly. I appreciated the bit in Gaudi Afternoon where she hadn't read the rambling magical realism South American novel before translating it and was boggled by the unfolding plot. However, I am not convinced that you can fund a globe-trotting mystery-solving lifestyle from translating Spanish novels, or that you can wander off to Barcelona with your novel and maintain a freelance translation career without having any other jobs on the go or any contact with any other clients. But I suppose it was before e-mail...
no subject
Date: 2018-03-11 09:33 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2018-03-11 10:35 am (UTC)Does he ever seem to do teaching, though? Maybe he just has a lot of research money. Hmm, where does the money for the Foundation come from, I can't remember?
I remember when I reread the first of those books as an adult, and hit the bit where someone asks how many people are in the Foundation. The reply is "about 100 000, if you count the wives of the people who work there". *headdesk*