(no subject)
Dec. 5th, 2021 11:44 amI first became aware of John McPhee's Basin and Range when my absurdly talented friend Shannon did an absolutely stunning comic; I became further aware of it because Shannon sat on my couch with
blotthis and I said 'why is it so hard to find nonfiction that is both good and well-written' and received a more-or-less synchronous response, 'have you heard the good word of John McPhee --'
Unsurprisingly, Basin and Range is indeed gorgeously written, a journey through the human understanding of geology and deep time which was both extremely worth reading for me and a kind of humbling demonstration of just how bad my brain is at thinking about things outside of the human spectrum -- it took me about twice as long to read this relatively slim book as I expected, because I'd encounter three beautiful pages about the geologic narrative to be found in the transformation of the world's materials under various pressures and my mind, which is not practiced in finding rocks interesting, would slide right off the cliff face and I would have to go back and read it again to get it to latch.
My favorite moment in the book is a reported conversation between McPhee and his silver-mining geologist guide which goes like this:
"The geologist has to choose the course of action with the best statistical chance. As a result, the style of geology is full of inferences, and they change. No one has ever seen a geosyncline. No one has ever seen the welding of tuff. No one has ever seen a granite batholith intrude."
Since I was digging his sample pits, I felt enfranchised to remark on what I took to be the literary timbre of his science.
"There's an essential difference," he said. "The authors of literary works may not have intended all the subtleties, complexities, undertones, and overtones that are attributed to them by critics and by students writing doctoral theses."
"That is what God says about geologists," I told him, chipping into the sediment with his broken shovel.
What I like about this passage is it describes a lot of the essential frustration/fascination of the project of trying to understand our world, and it also captures the quality of the numinous in the natural, and it is also just a very good joke; McPhee's gift lies in his ability to do all of this at once.
Unsurprisingly, Basin and Range is indeed gorgeously written, a journey through the human understanding of geology and deep time which was both extremely worth reading for me and a kind of humbling demonstration of just how bad my brain is at thinking about things outside of the human spectrum -- it took me about twice as long to read this relatively slim book as I expected, because I'd encounter three beautiful pages about the geologic narrative to be found in the transformation of the world's materials under various pressures and my mind, which is not practiced in finding rocks interesting, would slide right off the cliff face and I would have to go back and read it again to get it to latch.
My favorite moment in the book is a reported conversation between McPhee and his silver-mining geologist guide which goes like this:
"The geologist has to choose the course of action with the best statistical chance. As a result, the style of geology is full of inferences, and they change. No one has ever seen a geosyncline. No one has ever seen the welding of tuff. No one has ever seen a granite batholith intrude."
Since I was digging his sample pits, I felt enfranchised to remark on what I took to be the literary timbre of his science.
"There's an essential difference," he said. "The authors of literary works may not have intended all the subtleties, complexities, undertones, and overtones that are attributed to them by critics and by students writing doctoral theses."
"That is what God says about geologists," I told him, chipping into the sediment with his broken shovel.
What I like about this passage is it describes a lot of the essential frustration/fascination of the project of trying to understand our world, and it also captures the quality of the numinous in the natural, and it is also just a very good joke; McPhee's gift lies in his ability to do all of this at once.
no subject
Date: 2021-12-05 06:11 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2021-12-05 06:12 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2021-12-05 07:38 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2021-12-05 08:11 pm (UTC)It sounds great!
Do you still want recommendations for well-written nonfiction (and/or about the natural world), or are you set with John McPhee?
no subject
Date: 2021-12-05 09:09 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2021-12-05 09:42 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2021-12-05 11:28 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2021-12-06 12:48 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2021-12-06 01:11 am (UTC)This is a wonderful sentence. I feel the same, and while I love John McPhee--as you say, so good for interesting content presented in elegant, satisfying language, with a deadpan sense of humor peeking out at intervals--I tend to prefer his writing about people. I think my favorite at the moment is Uncommon Carriers.
no subject
Date: 2021-12-06 03:31 pm (UTC)A few hours later I emerged and demanded the next issue, only to be told it wouldn't arrive till next week. I don't remember my exact reaction, but I believe it involved my first instance of adolescent snarling. Despite this, she let me read the next issue before she did, and the one after that.
The book form, with all four parts together so I could jump back and forth and cross-reference easily, was wonderful. So were the other three parts of the series it starts, Annals of the Former World, also about U.S. geography. I still have the omnibus, with its omake fifth part. If you liked Basin and Range, you will like the rest.
I also commend his The Control of Nature and Coming into the Country. But most all of his books are most excellent non-fiction. I tend to prefer his book-length non-fiction to his shorter essays, but I like the immersion into his worldbuilding. There are two (or three?) John McPhee Readers of selections, which are good for finding works that catch your fancy.
no subject
Date: 2021-12-07 03:32 am (UTC)Anyway, as you know, I loved Basin and Range a lot! The narrative, deep time aspect is both what I find most fascinating about geology and what I tend to need someone to help explain in story terms to me, and McPhee just does it SO incredibly well and cleverly.
no subject
Date: 2021-12-08 05:34 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2021-12-08 06:01 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2021-12-08 06:02 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2021-12-08 06:03 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2021-12-08 06:04 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2021-12-08 06:04 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2021-12-08 06:05 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2021-12-08 06:06 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2021-12-08 06:06 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2021-12-08 06:08 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2021-12-08 06:10 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2021-12-08 06:10 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2021-12-08 06:11 am (UTC)(please enlighten me on your batholith discoveries)
no subject
Date: 2021-12-08 06:14 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2021-12-08 06:16 am (UTC)Edmund de Waal's The Hare with Amber Eyes (2010), Robert Macfarlane's The Old Ways (2012), and Iain Sinclair and Rachel Lichtenstein's Rodinsky's Room (1999) are the first that come to mind, although anything by those authors is almost certainly worth your time.
no subject
Date: 2021-12-08 06:33 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2021-12-08 03:07 pm (UTC)(None of them are actually on display now. My office cubie needs some color, with everything having just been painted a corporate grayish off-white. My task is clear.)
no subject
Date: 2021-12-08 07:37 pm (UTC)(The entire book is also very good yes yes yes)