(no subject)
Dec. 10th, 2008 03:40 pmI told
ms_ntropy that I had made a goal for myself to read more nonfiction, and she recommended me Bill Bryson's A Short History of Nearly Everything. Trustingly, I went and reserved it at the library. Little did I know that by doing so I would be committing myself to reading a 600-page history-of-science textbook a year after escaping my last school-mandated science class! Yes, perhaps the 'Nearly Everything in the title should have been a clue.
However, despite the flashbacks to the days of midterms and problem sets I kept having while toting it around after reading it my head is full of entertaining prose (I had actually never read a book by Bryson before, and was pleasantly surprised!) and possibly a few snippets of useful information stuck there as well, so I guess I must admit it was not a bad thing really. I wish I could claim that I enjoyed it because I was Seriously Interested in Knowledge for Knowledge's Own Sake, but I am afraid I must confess that what I really enjoyed reading about most was the dead-Victorian-scientist gossip. Almost as fun as dead-author gossip for bitchiness and backstabbing! (In some cases literally; one scientist ended up curator of the donated-to-research twisted spine of the other scientist whose life he had previously dedicated himself to ruining. How is this not soap opera material?) So, real scientists may scoff, but I say, pop science histories chock full of tales of rivalry and fraud for the win!
However, despite the flashbacks to the days of midterms and problem sets I kept having while toting it around after reading it my head is full of entertaining prose (I had actually never read a book by Bryson before, and was pleasantly surprised!) and possibly a few snippets of useful information stuck there as well, so I guess I must admit it was not a bad thing really. I wish I could claim that I enjoyed it because I was Seriously Interested in Knowledge for Knowledge's Own Sake, but I am afraid I must confess that what I really enjoyed reading about most was the dead-Victorian-scientist gossip. Almost as fun as dead-author gossip for bitchiness and backstabbing! (In some cases literally; one scientist ended up curator of the donated-to-research twisted spine of the other scientist whose life he had previously dedicated himself to ruining. How is this not soap opera material?) So, real scientists may scoff, but I say, pop science histories chock full of tales of rivalry and fraud for the win!
no subject
Date: 2008-12-10 09:11 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-12-10 09:16 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-12-10 09:17 pm (UTC)What I mean to say is that I'm glad he's not just like that across the board!
no subject
Date: 2008-12-10 09:24 pm (UTC)I am not sure I would have liked this book if I were a scientist, mind. But coming to it from a very lit-majory background, I really liked the constant reinforcement of the idea of how much we don't know, scientifically speaking.
no subject
Date: 2008-12-10 09:49 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-12-10 09:55 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-12-10 09:56 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-12-10 10:07 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-12-10 09:56 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-12-10 10:10 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-12-10 09:26 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-12-10 09:27 pm (UTC)I heart that book. I really do. ESPECIALLY THE BACK-STABBING, which is I think the main reason he wrote it.
Also, I recommend his book Mother Tongue on the history and twists of the English language.
no subject
Date: 2008-12-10 09:31 pm (UTC)Ooh, language history. *makes note!*
no subject
Date: 2008-12-10 09:34 pm (UTC)I think, although I am not sure, that the words from this icon come from that book (where he would be quoting someone else, I think). It's just. Reallly, really, really good.
no subject
Date: 2008-12-10 09:42 pm (UTC)*giggles* That seems likely! I have always been fond of that icon of yours.
no subject
Date: 2008-12-10 09:34 pm (UTC)(Also, it makes me happy to no end that you still have your Our Mrs Tudor icon.)
no subject
Date: 2008-12-10 09:43 pm (UTC)(Dude, I am never getting rid of that icon. *beams*)
no subject
Date: 2008-12-10 09:47 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-12-10 10:15 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-12-10 10:17 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-12-10 10:23 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-12-10 10:25 pm (UTC)It was even better on the flight back four months later, because then I knew what he was talking about.
no subject
Date: 2008-12-10 10:29 pm (UTC)