(no subject)
Aug. 23rd, 2010 10:39 amI read a Georgette Heyer book this weekend that I didn't love or even really like at all, which makes me kind of sad as even the less-appealing Heyers usually have enough highly entertaining bits to count as comfort reading for me. But in Bath Tangle, I just couldn't get past the fact that the hero and the heroine are two of the most enormous jerks I have yet encountered in a Heyer novel, and that possibly includes the villains. They are meant to be appealingly passionate and have argumentative chemistry, but I sort of suspect they actually both have serious anger management issues and will end up murdering each other within a year, taking out a wide swathe of bystanders along the way.
The storyline also centers around a trope that I have discovered generally tends to frustrate me, which I have dubbed Engagement Chicken. The game of Engagement Chicken, a popular pastime in the Regency period as far as I can tell from romance novels, is played something like this:
Character A: Character B, whom I secretly love, has become engaged to someone else! So now I will become engaged to someone else. TAKE THAT, CHARACTER B.
Character B: Wait, now that you're engaged to someone else I have figured out I love you! But I can't break my engagement unless Character C also wants to break it.
Character C: I have realized my terrible mistake in getting engaged to Character B, but I can't break my engagement unless Character B also wants to break it.
Character A: Hah, I knew you didn't love Character C!
Character B: SHUT UP I AM TOTALLY MARRYING CHARACTER C AND I HATE YOU.
Character A: Anyway, I can only break my engagement to Character D if they also want to break our engagement!
Character B: . . . so, hypothetically speaking, Character C, what are the circumstances under which you would break our engagement?
Character C: I would never break our engagement! Unless, I mean, unless you wanted to break our engagement.
Character B: What, I mean, why would you even think that? Damn our inevitable misery, full speed ahead!
Character D: I have realized my terrible mistake in getting engaged to Character A, but I can't break my engagement unless Character A also wants to break it . . .
EVERYONE: *sits around and stares hard at each other as the wedding dates approach until SOMEONE finally gets fed up enough to break their engagement, generally in the last five pages of the book*
Sometimes there is only one engagement involved, sometimes there are two or three, but it always involves a lot of sitting around and agonizing over the terrible mistake they have made and how they can possibly extricate themselves.
Is there already a name for this trope, or have I discovered a new one? And are there enough examples that it could, say, justify a TVtropes page? Flist, your input and examples would be appreciated!
The storyline also centers around a trope that I have discovered generally tends to frustrate me, which I have dubbed Engagement Chicken. The game of Engagement Chicken, a popular pastime in the Regency period as far as I can tell from romance novels, is played something like this:
Character A: Character B, whom I secretly love, has become engaged to someone else! So now I will become engaged to someone else. TAKE THAT, CHARACTER B.
Character B: Wait, now that you're engaged to someone else I have figured out I love you! But I can't break my engagement unless Character C also wants to break it.
Character C: I have realized my terrible mistake in getting engaged to Character B, but I can't break my engagement unless Character B also wants to break it.
Character A: Hah, I knew you didn't love Character C!
Character B: SHUT UP I AM TOTALLY MARRYING CHARACTER C AND I HATE YOU.
Character A: Anyway, I can only break my engagement to Character D if they also want to break our engagement!
Character B: . . . so, hypothetically speaking, Character C, what are the circumstances under which you would break our engagement?
Character C: I would never break our engagement! Unless, I mean, unless you wanted to break our engagement.
Character B: What, I mean, why would you even think that? Damn our inevitable misery, full speed ahead!
Character D: I have realized my terrible mistake in getting engaged to Character A, but I can't break my engagement unless Character A also wants to break it . . .
EVERYONE: *sits around and stares hard at each other as the wedding dates approach until SOMEONE finally gets fed up enough to break their engagement, generally in the last five pages of the book*
Sometimes there is only one engagement involved, sometimes there are two or three, but it always involves a lot of sitting around and agonizing over the terrible mistake they have made and how they can possibly extricate themselves.
Is there already a name for this trope, or have I discovered a new one? And are there enough examples that it could, say, justify a TVtropes page? Flist, your input and examples would be appreciated!
no subject
Date: 2010-08-23 03:09 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-08-23 03:37 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-08-24 01:59 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-08-24 04:24 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-08-23 03:19 pm (UTC)I usually rely on Heyer to provide comfort reading for me as well, so I will avoid this one. The only time she's let me down so far was with "Devil's Cub" -- I loathed the "hero" so much by the end that I was disappointed when they got together. But at least that one featured a heroine I could stomach....
no subject
Date: 2010-08-23 03:25 pm (UTC)Bath Tangle is one of the weakest of the Heyers, I agree. I've more or less forgotten it, and I don't forget the good Heyers.
no subject
Date: 2010-08-23 03:38 pm (UTC)But then, Wuthering Heights is one of my favorite books ever, so my feminist will obviously has its own issues... :)
no subject
Date: 2010-08-23 04:34 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-08-23 03:41 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-08-23 04:11 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-08-23 04:20 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-08-23 03:39 pm (UTC)In this case it's not just that the hero and heroine were terrible to each other, but they were both really, really awful to a third party who should not have been involved (see: Engagement Chicken) and I pretty much just could not take it.
no subject
Date: 2010-08-23 04:45 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-08-23 04:47 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-08-23 04:58 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-08-23 04:42 pm (UTC)Wodehouse actually does Engagement Chicken well.
no subject
Date: 2010-08-23 04:46 pm (UTC)It's true, he does. I can think of two explanations for this: neither Jeeves nor Wooster has any kind of a tendency to agonize, and Wodehouse is incapable of writing any plotline that isn't hilarious.
. . . relatedly, I need to read more Jeeves and Wooster books.
no subject
Date: 2010-08-23 04:54 pm (UTC)Both of these explanations hold great truth.
I also need to read more of them.
no subject
Date: 2010-08-23 04:57 pm (UTC)I also keep meaning to watch the show; I have been kind of subliminally programmed into wanting to do so since the soundtrack was my mom's ringtone for a while.
no subject
Date: 2010-08-27 09:24 pm (UTC)The show is glorious! ...It gets weaker later on I admit, but Laurie and Fry are so perfect. And man, is that opening theme addictive.
no subject
Date: 2010-08-23 06:29 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-08-23 06:33 pm (UTC)Unless the runner-up is a sloth.
no subject
Date: 2010-08-23 06:44 pm (UTC)"If you break your engagement, you will have to marry me!"
no subject
Date: 2010-08-23 06:57 pm (UTC)"I have realized my terrible mistake in getting engaged to Akio, but I can't break my engagement unless Akio also wants to break it . . ."
"I would never break our engagement! Unless, I mean, you have a black-rose-induced psychotic break. No wait, not even then."
no subject
Date: 2010-08-23 09:02 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-08-23 09:10 pm (UTC)@_@
@_@
Mikage in a Georgette Heyer novel is a thing that needs NEVER TO HAPPEN.
@_@ @_@ @_@ @_@ @_@!
no subject
Date: 2010-08-24 03:07 am (UTC)ETA: Also,
And if you do, you can claim a written forfeit of your choice from me. :)
no subject
Date: 2010-08-23 06:33 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-08-23 06:38 pm (UTC)(Unless, I mean, unless you wanted to -)
no subject
Date: 2010-08-23 06:44 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-08-23 07:00 pm (UTC)(mukashi mukashi . . .)
no subject
Date: 2010-08-23 09:03 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-08-23 09:08 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-08-23 10:33 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-08-24 12:24 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-08-24 12:54 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-08-24 12:57 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-08-24 12:59 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-08-24 01:02 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-08-24 01:20 am (UTC)It occurs to me that this trope should also be REALLY POPULAR in kdrama, though the only not-exactly example I can think of is Full House, where B marries A in a contractual marriage to make C, who he's been in love with for years, jealous because she's been in love with D, who actually develops a thing for A... And all A wants out is to get her house back.
(Though maybe it doesn't exactly fit because A and B actually DO get together in the end, though not until they go through A DIVORCE ahaha)
no subject
Date: 2010-08-24 01:23 am (UTC)