(no subject)
Mar. 7th, 2012 03:33 pmI think
rymenhild first recommended me A Canticle for Leibowitz six or seven years ago, which just goes to show you what an awesomely timely person I am. But I'm glad I read it when I did, because man, guys, it is such an archival book, I feel like I can appreciate it ten times better now I'm in archives school.
So A Canticle for Leibowitz is one of those grim sixties sci-fi novels about the nuclear apocalypse and how mankind continually shoots itself in the foot, or, more commonly, in the head. It is super, super sixties. Everyone is white. There are 2.5 female characters, and one is a reporter who is identified (after First Reporter, Second Reporter, etc.) as Lady Reporter, and the other is a mutant tomato-seller with two heads. (The .5 is head number two.) However, it is also really good!
The first section is sort of medievalish and involves a young monk finding the remnants of a fallout shelter which includes relics of candidate-for-sainthood Leibowitz, whose notable deeds involve preserving a bunch of books and blueprints and so forth in the post-apocalyptic chaos and promptly being martyred. But what is actually important in this first story (if you are an archivist) is the lengthy discussion of how the monks do their best to accurately preserve the blueprints and records, even though they can't really make heads or tails of them . . . and then after having preserved the originals they create an illuminated copy. OH BLESS.
The second section is vaguely Renaissanceish and is about the rediscovery of electricity, sort of, but what it is actually about (if you are an archivist) is the eternal question of ACCESS vs. PRESERVATION and whether Secular Renaissance Genius has the right to complain about the monks holding on to all these important archival materials and keeping them in their tiny out-of-the-way monastery.
Then the third section is about the end of the world again but it's also about how hope is basically starting an archive on Mars, so you I think get my drift here. ARCHIVES ARCHIVES ARCHIVES.
ANYWAY. The other reason I read this book right now is for a paper that I am going to be writing this semester for one of my classes . . . and for that I need your guys' help! I want to write about the fetishization of the archive in post-apocalyptic sci-fi -- you guys know the kind of thing I mean, civilization is destroyed or reset or whatever but now we have the LOST ARCHIVE OF THE ANCIENTS, where the account of pre-apocalyptic history and technology still exist in remarkably good condition, all things considered. Or, alternately, civilization is being destroyed as we speak but IF WE SAVE THE ARCHIVE we can create hope for a better future someday. Like that!
So if you can think of any post-apocalyptic books or movies that feature ARCHIVES (or MUSEUMS or LIBRARIES), please do rec them to me! They do not actually have to be good and can in fact be actively terrible as long as they fit this criteria. Special bonus points if the archive actually features audiovisual material, although I do not think there will actually be many of these, especially not in works from the sixties when they were still learning about videotape.
So A Canticle for Leibowitz is one of those grim sixties sci-fi novels about the nuclear apocalypse and how mankind continually shoots itself in the foot, or, more commonly, in the head. It is super, super sixties. Everyone is white. There are 2.5 female characters, and one is a reporter who is identified (after First Reporter, Second Reporter, etc.) as Lady Reporter, and the other is a mutant tomato-seller with two heads. (The .5 is head number two.) However, it is also really good!
The first section is sort of medievalish and involves a young monk finding the remnants of a fallout shelter which includes relics of candidate-for-sainthood Leibowitz, whose notable deeds involve preserving a bunch of books and blueprints and so forth in the post-apocalyptic chaos and promptly being martyred. But what is actually important in this first story (if you are an archivist) is the lengthy discussion of how the monks do their best to accurately preserve the blueprints and records, even though they can't really make heads or tails of them . . . and then after having preserved the originals they create an illuminated copy. OH BLESS.
The second section is vaguely Renaissanceish and is about the rediscovery of electricity, sort of, but what it is actually about (if you are an archivist) is the eternal question of ACCESS vs. PRESERVATION and whether Secular Renaissance Genius has the right to complain about the monks holding on to all these important archival materials and keeping them in their tiny out-of-the-way monastery.
Then the third section is about the end of the world again but it's also about how hope is basically starting an archive on Mars, so you I think get my drift here. ARCHIVES ARCHIVES ARCHIVES.
ANYWAY. The other reason I read this book right now is for a paper that I am going to be writing this semester for one of my classes . . . and for that I need your guys' help! I want to write about the fetishization of the archive in post-apocalyptic sci-fi -- you guys know the kind of thing I mean, civilization is destroyed or reset or whatever but now we have the LOST ARCHIVE OF THE ANCIENTS, where the account of pre-apocalyptic history and technology still exist in remarkably good condition, all things considered. Or, alternately, civilization is being destroyed as we speak but IF WE SAVE THE ARCHIVE we can create hope for a better future someday. Like that!
So if you can think of any post-apocalyptic books or movies that feature ARCHIVES (or MUSEUMS or LIBRARIES), please do rec them to me! They do not actually have to be good and can in fact be actively terrible as long as they fit this criteria. Special bonus points if the archive actually features audiovisual material, although I do not think there will actually be many of these, especially not in works from the sixties when they were still learning about videotape.
no subject
Date: 2012-03-07 08:58 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-03-07 09:00 pm (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2012-03-07 08:58 pm (UTC)Oh man, it's been too long since I read that sucker.
Does it have to be post-apocalyptic? Because the first thing that's coming to mind for me is ATLA. But I will keep thinking!
no subject
Date: 2012-03-07 09:01 pm (UTC)It has to be post-apocalyptic because if I broadened it out enough to include stuff like ATLA then I would not be able to keep this paper to 15 pages. *laughing* OTHERWISE, YES.
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2012-03-07 09:03 pm (UTC)As to your question: There's a later episode of Babylon 5 that contains a huge riff on Canticle (Straczynski basically said that as he was writing it he said "crap, it's too much like Canticle, aw, screw it"), and of course the short-lived spinoff Crusade was archaeological sci-fi. Won't say more until you're done, which reminds me, DVDs? *grin*
The Assassin's Creed series is a lot of that too, complete with "First Civilization" archives/temples (yes, they were the Greek gods, long story).
What about Foundation, which is sort of similar?
no subject
Date: 2012-03-07 10:27 pm (UTC)Also: you wouldn't happen to remember what season that episode is in, would you? And whether it would spoil me like crazy to watch it out of order? *laughing*
I read Foundation so long ago that I don't super remember it, but I know it is similar, and I should probably reread it as a part of this.
(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2012-03-07 09:24 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-03-07 10:28 pm (UTC). . . at least we don't live in the sixties anymore? Um.
Andre Norton is a good rec, though, thank you!
no subject
Date: 2012-03-07 09:43 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-03-07 10:29 pm (UTC). . . . hahaha thank you for reminding me about that Twilight Zone episode, though, because MAN.
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2012-03-07 10:01 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-03-07 10:31 pm (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2012-03-07 10:07 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-03-07 10:32 pm (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2012-03-07 10:42 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-03-09 01:59 pm (UTC)Anyway, the point is I approve this project. DEFEND IT TO ME. (I like a lot of the religious stuff in Canticle, but it is definitely not as broad a view of Catholicism as it needs to be.)
no subject
Date: 2012-03-07 10:56 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-03-09 02:01 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-03-07 11:08 pm (UTC)OSC fits "actively terrible" but perhaps not in precisely that way. Ender saves the human race by watching archival vids from the first "apocalypse" and figuring out about the Hive Queen though?
Hum hum, scrolling through my years-out-of-date booklist... oh man, how about Alphabet of Thorn? No, wait, that's not postapocalyptic.
no subject
Date: 2012-03-08 02:53 am (UTC)etc
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2012-03-07 11:25 pm (UTC)Also, I've only read "Canticle" once since then (I kept the book I bought for that class!) but over the years I seem to have gotten the third section mixed up in my head with the story about the computer that could calculate the Answer to Life, the Universe, and Everything in "The Hitchhker's Guide to the Galaxy." I don't know why!
Unfortunately I can't think of other books or movies about SAVING ALL THE ARCHIVES off the top of my head, but I'll let you know if I come across something that might be useful.
no subject
Date: 2012-03-09 01:54 pm (UTC)There actually are very few computers in the third section! And maybe one of my favorite things about the book is that the one piece of helpful high-tech they have spends most of its time being broken while they try and fiddle with it and accidentally break it further. TECHNOLOGY: still prone to tripping over its own feet.
Thank you! :D
no subject
Date: 2012-03-07 11:35 pm (UTC)They are also a retelling of part of the Book of Mormon (another reason I love them, because retellings of religious documents where God = AI are AWESOME) which I guess doesn't really count as fantasy especially if you happen to be Mormon (which I am, nominally), but it does have quite an obsession with archives and providing written records; the entire thing is framed by the guy who says "I'm abridging all these records and sticking them in a hole in the ground!" and every so often you have someone showing up randomly with records someone else left lying about.
no subject
Date: 2012-03-09 02:56 pm (UTC)The archival framing sequence at least definitely does sound relevant. (hahahaha "I'm abridging all these records and sticking them in a hole in the ground!" IN A PROPER ARCHIVAL BOX SURROUNDED BY PLASTIC I HOPE.)
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2012-03-08 12:34 am (UTC)TO GOOGLE!
no subject
Date: 2012-03-09 02:58 pm (UTC)WAS EVERYONE IN THIS BOOK ANIMALS
because if so this is a book that I read as a kid!
. . . if not it may also be a book that I read as a kid, just one I don't remember as well.
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2012-03-08 01:33 am (UTC)OH WAIT
PROBABLY THE SAME WAY I FORGOT THAT I HAVE TO RETURN THOSE TO YOU.
no subject
Date: 2012-03-09 02:59 pm (UTC)(Did you actually finish, or do I still owe you the last one?
-- also you didn't lend me The Reluctant God!)
(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2012-03-08 02:13 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-03-08 02:47 am (UTC)Similarly SG-1, which has some kind of data repository thing that literally reaches out, grabs people by the head and shoves ALL THE KNOWLEDGE into their brains, which is should-be fatal because people these days don't have big enough brains, is more a diminishing-world type thing (I think? My SG-1 is a bit hazy) than post-apocalypse. Still, you know, archive that
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2012-03-08 02:54 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-03-08 02:55 am (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2012-03-08 06:00 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-03-09 03:06 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-03-08 09:50 am (UTC)Carol Berg's Flesh and Spirit involves a group of monks who believe the apocalypse is coming, and so are creating an archive.
no subject
Date: 2012-03-09 03:07 pm (UTC)Flesh and Spirit also sounds relevant, thank you!
no subject
Date: 2012-03-08 02:31 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-03-09 03:07 pm (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From: