(no subject)
Mar. 26th, 2012 03:37 pmLords and Ladies, oh gosh, Lords and Ladies. A reasonable proportion of the Pratchett books I've been trucking through have pleasantly equalled my expectations, but I think I had literally forgotten how good Lords and Ladies was. Not that I didn't remember it as good! I just didn't remember it was that good.
Here are the top ten things that are great about Lords and Ladies:
10. Once again, all of the important battles and shifts in power dynamics happen between women. That's just HOW THEY ROLL in Lancre.
9. That being said, Shane Ogg the Perennially Ridiculous and Jason Ogg the Somewhat Less Ridiculous both get to be legitimately awesome.
8. On a related note, Ridcully is unhelpfully soppy and lovestruck and it's taken exactly as seriously as it deserves. (I am actually really sad that Ridcully and Granny never get to meet again in the series, I would read a million books in which they fight crime, or possibly each other, while having belligerent sexual tension. YES I WOULD. You can't judge me, YOU TOTALLY WOULD TOO.)
7. And he got the Librarian to Lancre by telling him they had shelves and shelves of UNCATALOGED BOOKS! THIS HURTS THE LIBRARIAN IN HIS PRESERVATIONIST SOUL.
6. Being engaged to a king doesn't have to be about sitting around doing embroidery, and being kind and sort of soppy doesn't have to mean being weak.
5. Nanny and Granny are the best of teams. The challenge in the square! That may well be my favorite scene, hands down.
4. Granny Weatherwax IS A STONE COLD BADASS
3. Nanny Ogg is a SEXY badass.
2. Magrat Garlick is a soppy, kittens-loving, ARMOR-WEARING ELF-SLAYING BADASS QUEEN
1. No, actually, even after Magrat put on her shining armor, hoisted her weaponry and went charging off to rescue her prince, Granny Weatherwax is STILL THE MOST BADASS OF THEM ALL, FOREVER AND ALWAYS
Guys, I am excited for Maskerade and for Carpe Jugulum, I know that these are books I also love enormously, but right now I'm just sort of like how does it get BETTER?
Here are the top ten things that are great about Lords and Ladies:
10. Once again, all of the important battles and shifts in power dynamics happen between women. That's just HOW THEY ROLL in Lancre.
9. That being said, Shane Ogg the Perennially Ridiculous and Jason Ogg the Somewhat Less Ridiculous both get to be legitimately awesome.
8. On a related note, Ridcully is unhelpfully soppy and lovestruck and it's taken exactly as seriously as it deserves. (I am actually really sad that Ridcully and Granny never get to meet again in the series, I would read a million books in which they fight crime, or possibly each other, while having belligerent sexual tension. YES I WOULD. You can't judge me, YOU TOTALLY WOULD TOO.)
7. And he got the Librarian to Lancre by telling him they had shelves and shelves of UNCATALOGED BOOKS! THIS HURTS THE LIBRARIAN IN HIS PRESERVATIONIST SOUL.
6. Being engaged to a king doesn't have to be about sitting around doing embroidery, and being kind and sort of soppy doesn't have to mean being weak.
5. Nanny and Granny are the best of teams. The challenge in the square! That may well be my favorite scene, hands down.
4. Granny Weatherwax IS A STONE COLD BADASS
3. Nanny Ogg is a SEXY badass.
2. Magrat Garlick is a soppy, kittens-loving, ARMOR-WEARING ELF-SLAYING BADASS QUEEN
1. No, actually, even after Magrat put on her shining armor, hoisted her weaponry and went charging off to rescue her prince, Granny Weatherwax is STILL THE MOST BADASS OF THEM ALL, FOREVER AND ALWAYS
Guys, I am excited for Maskerade and for Carpe Jugulum, I know that these are books I also love enormously, but right now I'm just sort of like how does it get BETTER?
no subject
Date: 2012-03-26 10:27 pm (UTC)Because of COURSE the elf believes that all of the strength and merciless crossbow murder has been just an affectation, just Magrat trying to psyche herself up to be what she really isn't. Of COURSE it couldn't possibly backfire to take a witch and burn her down to the core of what she is and what she does. Possibly this is the drawback of gathering intelligence with psionic powers--you come away thinking your enemies are as weak as they think they are.
(I think I am just a sucker for stories where the villain signs their own death warrant.)
no subject
Date: 2012-03-27 12:09 am (UTC)(Me too! And this is such a perfect example of that. I also love people who are far more amazing than they think they are . . . and that's Magrat.)
no subject
Date: 2012-03-27 01:28 am (UTC)And it is funny, viewing the books in relation to each other, that a common theme is "right authority"--the witches decide to replace the king with their own chosen figurehead in WS, then depose Lily who did the same thing in WA, then stop the elves from doing the same to Lance in LL, then Granny comes down with a serious case of self-doubt when it is time for her to play kingmaker/kingpreserver again in CJ. Witches can't rule, but they can involve themselves in deciding who will, and that's a very, very dangerous activity. All of which goes back to MacBeth.
Maskerade... doesn't quite fit that pattern, but then Maskerade is not so much about three witches as about Agnes-on-her-own plus Nanny-and-Granny-minus-Magrat, which turns out to be "how Nanny keeps the increasingly powerful Granny from losing it without the usual three-witches-business." Actually with Granny's pose as Dame Weatherwax in Maskerade, she skates verrrrry close to Lily's "Lady Tempscire".
It also implies that the kingship/queenship thing was a Magrat storyline under it all, interestingly enough.
So.... that was a lot of babbling, but I feel like there's a throughline here, right? Just... I can't put my finger on it.
no subject
Date: 2012-03-27 01:33 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-03-27 03:21 am (UTC)Esme Weatherwax is all about the difference between story and reality, but reality has always been more complicated than she likes to see it. In Wyrd Sisters and Witches Abroad, they thwart the story. But then in Lords and Ladies, Magrat uses the story. And Esme spends a lot of time rejecting Ridcully's nostalgia as a story, but then has to admit that in some world, some way, it's true.
This isn't quite a complete throughline either, but . . .
no subject
Date: 2012-03-27 01:27 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-03-27 01:07 am (UTC)Also GRANNY WEATHERWAX ♥.
no subject
Date: 2012-03-27 03:22 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-03-27 01:28 am (UTC)BUT YES. GRANNY WEATHERWAX VS. THE ELF QUEEN.
"You've lived longer than me but I'm older than you. And better than you. And madam, that ain't hard."
no subject
Date: 2012-03-27 03:24 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-03-27 04:27 am (UTC)being kind and sort of soppy doesn't have to mean being weak.
Tell it, sister. This is one thing I find I get annoyed with at times. Not a lot, but sometimes! For a female character to "kick ass" in a traditional sense, she has to fight like a man, basically. I love Alanna, I adore the characters who take on that role... but I'm not one of them. I'm kind and sort of soppy, but that definitely doesn't mean I'm weak. It just means I fight in a different way.
I admire Pratchett very much for writing these books and creating these characters, and I'm delighted with what he's done in the Tiffany Aching series, too. He writes women I know and/or women I'd like to be. And to manage that in a fantasy novel isn't the easiest thing in the world!
no subject
Date: 2012-03-27 11:04 am (UTC)ps your icon is perfect for this
Date: 2012-03-27 02:54 pm (UTC)AND WORD. I used to be the kid who wanted to see the lady with a sword kicking ass and taking names, and . . . okay, I still want that, but I also want the lady who loves dancing and pretty dresses, and the lady who's the best damn knitter in the district, and the lady who logics the bad guy to his demise, and all the other hundreds of ways to be awesome. (You know what the best way is to get that? WRITING MORE THAN ONE SYMPATHETIC WOMAN INTO YOUR STORIES. Fantasy writers, take note.)
no subject
Date: 2012-03-27 10:11 am (UTC)♥♥♥
When he gets it right, he really, really gets it right.
no subject
Date: 2012-03-27 02:50 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-03-27 03:25 pm (UTC)I need to reread it! I have not in ages. I love it, but it's not one of the ones I lend out except to people who already know and love Discworld or who are 100% predictably drawn to Midsummer Night's Dream retellings, because, I dunno, I have this memory of the power of it depending on associations from both Shakespeare and other Discworld in a way that doesn't necessarily translate? But that's a memory from when I last reread it years ago, and may be off-base.
But I LOVE ALL THE BADASS WITCHES IN IT SO MUCH, so I really do need to reread.
(However I would get tired fast of the Ridcully and Granny show of belligerent sexual tension, I have to say. This is mostly because I get tired of Ridcully and most of the other wizards pretty fast in any form. I don't hate them, but a little goes a long way for me. BUT I WOULD READ GRANNY IN LIKE ANY CONTEXT EVER, so there is that.)
no subject
Date: 2012-03-27 03:52 pm (UTC)I actually was sort of surprised by how little the power of it came from Shakespeare this time around. I mean, the Shakespeare connection is a fantastic bonus, but really it was all about the characters and they would be equally as awesome without that.
(Hee, well, Lords and Ladies was just the right amount of Ridcully for me, because he shows up like 3/4 of the way through, Granny relentlessly mocks him and maybe has like .1% of a feeling, and then he's gone. The perfect formula and one I would be very happy to see repeated!)
no subject
Date: 2012-03-28 09:14 pm (UTC)(Also, hi! I am adding you because I am loving your Pratchett reviews, hope you don't mind!).
no subject
Date: 2012-03-29 04:58 am (UTC)(And welcome! :D More people to talk about Pratchett with is always a plus around here.)