(no subject)
Feb. 20th, 2013 06:46 pmDanse de la Folie is Sherwood Smith's go at writing a very deliberately traditional and old-fashioned sort of feel-good Regency romance -- the Heyerian kind where everybody is aristocracy and nobody has sex and for the most part everybody is playing politely by the rules.
This book centers around a classic game of Engagement Chicken, which is a thing I discovered in a Heyer book a few years ago. To briefly summarize the rules, Engagement Chicken is a game for four players or more, in which everybody gets engaged to the wrong person and then sits around and stares hard at each other in the face of the rapidly approaching nuptials until somebody finally gives in and breaks their engagement. It seems to have been popular in the Regency and a certain kind of fantasy of manners.
-- and as a sidenote, if you have other fictional examples of games of Engagement Chicken, please share them because I still kind of want to populate a TVTropes page for this!
ANYWAY. Normally Engagement Chicken is a thing that annoys me, but here it doesn't bother me, mostly due to the fact that Player A's engagement and subsequent engagement-breaking have as much to do with social anxieties and her expectations of happiness in self-sufficiency as they do with pining after Player B.
I also enjoy the other heroine, a would-be writer of silly Gothics (I always like would-be writers of silly Gothics), and the friendship between the two of them, and the cheerfully non-evil stepmother and half-sisters. Overall it was a nice soothing Regency brain-bath, as it was designed to be, and my only actual quibble is the fact that I don't think we really needed to have That Mean Girl From High School -- who is sort of a stock Sherwood Smith character, and if we're going to have her I always want at least a little sympathy and development for her, and this is not the book for that.
This book centers around a classic game of Engagement Chicken, which is a thing I discovered in a Heyer book a few years ago. To briefly summarize the rules, Engagement Chicken is a game for four players or more, in which everybody gets engaged to the wrong person and then sits around and stares hard at each other in the face of the rapidly approaching nuptials until somebody finally gives in and breaks their engagement. It seems to have been popular in the Regency and a certain kind of fantasy of manners.
-- and as a sidenote, if you have other fictional examples of games of Engagement Chicken, please share them because I still kind of want to populate a TVTropes page for this!
ANYWAY. Normally Engagement Chicken is a thing that annoys me, but here it doesn't bother me, mostly due to the fact that Player A's engagement and subsequent engagement-breaking have as much to do with social anxieties and her expectations of happiness in self-sufficiency as they do with pining after Player B.
I also enjoy the other heroine, a would-be writer of silly Gothics (I always like would-be writers of silly Gothics), and the friendship between the two of them, and the cheerfully non-evil stepmother and half-sisters. Overall it was a nice soothing Regency brain-bath, as it was designed to be, and my only actual quibble is the fact that I don't think we really needed to have That Mean Girl From High School -- who is sort of a stock Sherwood Smith character, and if we're going to have her I always want at least a little sympathy and development for her, and this is not the book for that.
no subject
Date: 2013-02-21 12:19 am (UTC)You definitely need to make a tvtropes page for it!
no subject
Date: 2013-02-21 02:15 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2013-02-21 02:17 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2013-02-21 01:00 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2013-02-21 02:16 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2013-02-21 01:22 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2013-02-21 02:04 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2013-02-21 02:16 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2013-02-21 03:28 am (UTC)http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Jeeves_and_Wooster_episodes
no subject
Date: 2013-02-21 03:39 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2013-02-21 01:35 am (UTC)naq gura vg gbgnyyl jnfa'g!
no subject
Date: 2013-02-21 02:17 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2013-02-21 03:03 am (UTC)EDIT:
Clarissa Harlowe? Clarissa HARLOWE? For the name of a protagonist of a Regency novel who presumably lives happily ever after and is not, you know, deflowered or despoiled or doomed in any way? That is some hubris right there. What were you thinking, Sherwood Smith?
no subject
Date: 2013-02-21 03:18 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2013-02-21 03:34 am (UTC)I mean... I could see how it would look like the right name for a Regency heroine, all fluffy and elegant.
And then I remembered who Clarissa was, and I'm very much afraid I will not be able to suspend my disbelief through this book.
Okay, putting the computer away so I can watch Episode 17 of Princess Tutu before Mark gets to it. As you may have noticed, the Ahiru/Fakir shippers are already out in force over there, and there is going to be SOME EXPLOSION tomorrow when the newbies figure out that their ship is actually going canonical.
no subject
Date: 2013-02-21 03:37 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2013-02-21 05:31 am (UTC)It is awfully cute over there.
no subject
Date: 2013-02-21 12:50 pm (UTC)I think it helped that the mod arctic-hare felt free to observe, at that point, that Ahiru/Fakir is a popular ship for watchers of the show. But I also think everyone has noticed that Mytho has no personality and Fakir has plenty of personality, and they want Ahiru to end up with Fakir because they're more interested in him.
no subject
Date: 2013-02-22 02:14 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2013-02-22 02:18 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2013-02-21 06:56 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2013-02-21 12:37 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2013-02-21 03:21 am (UTC)(I am a very silly person.)
no subject
Date: 2013-02-21 03:23 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2013-02-21 03:24 am (UTC)I see chickens in Jane Austen garb, somehow. It's all a very proper imagining.
Bok!
no subject
Date: 2013-02-21 03:38 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2013-02-21 05:43 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2013-02-21 11:51 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2013-02-21 09:19 am (UTC)oh that book critique
Date: 2013-02-21 11:44 am (UTC)But actually I intended to comment just to say that it delights me that you named Emily's Quest, because of course that is Engagement Chicken.
Re: oh that book critique
Date: 2013-02-22 03:56 pm (UTC)Re: oh that book critique
Date: 2013-02-22 08:36 pm (UTC)Re: oh that book critique
Date: 2013-02-23 02:52 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2013-02-21 12:13 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2013-02-22 03:57 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2013-02-21 12:49 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2013-02-22 02:12 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2013-02-22 05:22 pm (UTC)