(no subject)
Mar. 8th, 2013 09:35 amLast night I turned in my thesis draft as it currently stands! ("As it currently stands" involves several large [BRACKET] sections at the end, but.) I was supposed to have a meeting this morning, but it got cancelled because of the snow, so now I don't have anywhere to be until half past noon and IT'S LOVELY. Thank you, snow!
It also means that I actually have time to write up a book!
I knew about For Darkness Shows the Stars as "post-apocalyptic Persuasion," which made me super intrigued but also kind of wary. I mean, Persuasion is very much not an adventure story, and very much is a book about Regency social class, and how would you even do that . . .?
The answer, it turns out, is "worldbuilding!" I'm not going to provide you all the details of how Diana Peterfreund gets to something that approximates Regency class structure in such a way as to highlight the themes of Persuasion, because that's a lot of info-dumping and also I still don't know how I feel about some of it, but there were a couple things she did that I really liked:
- RESPONSIBILITY. You know how, in theory, estate ownership is supposed to be a model in which the owners earn their privilege by taking personal responsibility for the well-being of everyone on their estate? Of course our Anne Elliot equivalent (here called Elliot North) believes this, deeply, and acts in accordance with it. And then the model is problematized and called out by other people within the text, because obviously it's a problematic and paternalistic model -- but Elliot is a good person and a responsible person, and in her terms and her cultural worldview, this is what being a good person and a responsible person means. Peterfreund knows this doesn't really justify Elliot's privilege. But Elliot doesn't know that, because this is her culture. (In case this isn't clear: I really, really like Elliot.)
- SOCIAL CHANGE. The culture that Peterfreund sets up is a culture in flux, as all cultures are, eventually, in flux. And the protagonists are involved in that to a certain extent, but it's not like anybody's LEADING THE REVOLUTION here. They're pretty much just doing what they do, and dealing with their own problems, and their worldview shifts, and coping with how these changes affect them. And that's something I always want more of in science fiction -- cultures that aren't static, and the stories that happen within the context of that cultural change.
I mean, there were also some things I liked less -- someone remind me, was Wentworth such a dick to Anne in the early parts of Persuasion? Because Kai, the Wentworth-equivalent, is SUCH A DICK to Elliot in the early parts of this book -- and the ending is very have-your-cake-and-eat-it-too in a way that emotionally I'm fine with but intellectually I am a little dubious about given the rest of the themes of the book.
But overall I really, really liked it. Am I in for the sequel, which is reportedly based on a gender-swapped Scarlet Pimpernel? I'M SO IN!
It also means that I actually have time to write up a book!
I knew about For Darkness Shows the Stars as "post-apocalyptic Persuasion," which made me super intrigued but also kind of wary. I mean, Persuasion is very much not an adventure story, and very much is a book about Regency social class, and how would you even do that . . .?
The answer, it turns out, is "worldbuilding!" I'm not going to provide you all the details of how Diana Peterfreund gets to something that approximates Regency class structure in such a way as to highlight the themes of Persuasion, because that's a lot of info-dumping and also I still don't know how I feel about some of it, but there were a couple things she did that I really liked:
- RESPONSIBILITY. You know how, in theory, estate ownership is supposed to be a model in which the owners earn their privilege by taking personal responsibility for the well-being of everyone on their estate? Of course our Anne Elliot equivalent (here called Elliot North) believes this, deeply, and acts in accordance with it. And then the model is problematized and called out by other people within the text, because obviously it's a problematic and paternalistic model -- but Elliot is a good person and a responsible person, and in her terms and her cultural worldview, this is what being a good person and a responsible person means. Peterfreund knows this doesn't really justify Elliot's privilege. But Elliot doesn't know that, because this is her culture. (In case this isn't clear: I really, really like Elliot.)
- SOCIAL CHANGE. The culture that Peterfreund sets up is a culture in flux, as all cultures are, eventually, in flux. And the protagonists are involved in that to a certain extent, but it's not like anybody's LEADING THE REVOLUTION here. They're pretty much just doing what they do, and dealing with their own problems, and their worldview shifts, and coping with how these changes affect them. And that's something I always want more of in science fiction -- cultures that aren't static, and the stories that happen within the context of that cultural change.
I mean, there were also some things I liked less -- someone remind me, was Wentworth such a dick to Anne in the early parts of Persuasion? Because Kai, the Wentworth-equivalent, is SUCH A DICK to Elliot in the early parts of this book -- and the ending is very have-your-cake-and-eat-it-too in a way that emotionally I'm fine with but intellectually I am a little dubious about given the rest of the themes of the book.
But overall I really, really liked it. Am I in for the sequel, which is reportedly based on a gender-swapped Scarlet Pimpernel? I'M SO IN!
no subject
Date: 2013-03-08 03:14 pm (UTC)Yay for a draft and snow!
no subject
Date: 2013-03-08 03:27 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2013-03-08 03:29 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2013-03-08 03:41 pm (UTC)The book sounds good, I'll have to check it out. I'm starting to really like Peterfreund based on her murderous-unicorn books, which are imperfect but center on girls being badass in different ways.
no subject
Date: 2013-03-08 03:51 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2013-03-08 11:09 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2013-03-08 04:06 pm (UTC)This sounds really interesting. I shall check it out!
no subject
Date: 2013-03-09 04:02 am (UTC)I will be curious what you think of it. :D
no subject
Date: 2013-03-08 04:09 pm (UTC)Wentworth is a bit of a dick? It's more, he does not address or communicate with Anne the whole first half but is CONSTANTLY AROUND. Just there, hanging out in people's houses with all his money, being single. Which, everyone interprets means he is courting one of the Musgroves, but you find out at the end that he was there to stare at Anne and angst. But, he was a bit of dick with his lack of talking.
no subject
Date: 2013-03-09 04:04 am (UTC)From this description I think that Kai Wentforth is probably more actively dickish than Wentworth -- like, he goes out of his way to make pick fights with Elliot's friends and make Elliot feel like a terrible person. WAY TO GO, WENTFORTH!
no subject
Date: 2013-03-08 04:35 pm (UTC)That said, Wentforth (HAHAHAHA, his name is my favorite) comes across as a bigger one. I also find Elliot's reasons for her choice much more compelling. It was more than being persuaded by family and friends. There was more at stake. I liked that.
Did you pick up on where it takes place? Because I totally missed it, which is especially embarrassing for me. XD
Her next book riffs on The Scarlet Pimpernel. Same universe. I am excited! (Eta: which you totally already mentioned. This is what I get for reading on my phone!)
no subject
Date: 2013-03-09 04:06 am (UTC)Hahaha, I totally didn't pick up on it until I read about it after. And, okay, this is embarrassing and totally speaks to my New York-centrism, but when they kept talking about islands, I was like ". . . Manhattan . . .?" OOPS.
SO EXCITED for the Scarlet Pimpernel book! \o/
no subject
Date: 2013-03-09 04:23 am (UTC)I think he was less of a dick than Darcy, but more of a dick than Edward Farris who I always view as just a bit of a oron with people.
I must read ALL THE THINGS.
no subject
Date: 2013-03-08 05:10 pm (UTC)...possibly this means I should be reading it as well.
no subject
Date: 2013-03-09 04:07 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2013-03-08 07:41 pm (UTC)You keep posting all these wonderful tantalizing posts about books that would be fun to read in my negative spare time. I haven't even made it halfway through Les Misérables yet. /pouts, glares, writes down title, because: excellent thoughtful world building + Persuasion = *__*
no subject
Date: 2013-03-09 04:08 am (UTC)My goal in life is to make everyone's to-read lists grow to the length of my own. >:D YOU'RE WELCOME!
no subject
Date: 2013-03-08 09:24 pm (UTC)And then I re-read persuasion, and went, "HOLY GOD, WENTWORTH, YOU ARE SUCH A DOUCHEBAG! YOU ONLY DESERVE ANNE BECAUSE SHE HAS CONDESCENDED TO LOVE YOU."
I mean, there is something quite appealing about a character who, on being called out for his privilege -- to put it in modern terms -- goes, "Shit, you're right," and starts to change. (See also why I love Darcy.) But he's terribly cruel to Anne, not necessarily intentionally, but coming on top of the way her father and older sister treat her, it's quite unpleasant.
no subject
Date: 2013-03-09 04:09 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2013-03-09 01:41 am (UTC)Congrats on the thesis draft!
no subject
Date: 2013-03-09 04:09 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2013-03-09 03:17 am (UTC)Also, Wentworth wasn't really that big a dick- he mostly just pretended they didn't know each other and he would like to keep it that way, and a couple of times he helped her out when she needed help. To me, he came across as rather understandably hurt and maybe a bit over the top huffy.
no subject
Date: 2013-03-09 04:10 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2013-03-09 03:51 am (UTC)And yeah, Wentworth really is kind of a dick at the beginning.
no subject
Date: 2013-03-09 04:11 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2013-03-09 11:16 pm (UTC)I'm interested that this aspect of Anne/Elliot as a steward of the estate being emphasised, as it always seemed more backdrop/ "see what good sense Anne has" in Persuasion and I would have liked to have seen Anne do more of it. Her competence has so little space to shine I suppose and then so much kudos is given to Wentworth for recognising it at all.
I find it harder to tell about Wentworth's initial dickishness. Because we see it through Anne's eyes we can read into it whatever favourable/unfavourable motivations we want to. And Austen is quite generous in letting Wentworth pen his own expiation. Does Kai get the same advantage?
Sorry for throwing badly gathered thoughts at you. I'm intrigued to read this book though. <3
no subject
Date: 2013-03-09 11:33 pm (UTC)Kai does sort of get to pen his own expiation! But it is not reeeeeally expiating enough in my opinion; other people's minds may vary!
And never apologize for throwing thoughts my way, I do these posts because I love book talk. :D
no subject
Date: 2013-03-11 01:20 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2013-03-11 02:36 am (UTC)