(no subject)
Apr. 29th, 2013 10:31 amI am so close to the end of my great Discworld reread! Three more books and then I'm ALL CAUGHT UP.
But today it is time to talk about Thud, which . . . hmmm. I remember really liking Thud when it first came out, especially after being less than one hundred percent impressed with Going Postal -- I think because it fit my impression of How Discworld Books Went for comfort reading, which Going Postal did not at the time -- and now my feelings appear to have switched?
It's not that I didn't enjoy Thud, but -- well, and maybe this is a function of reading all the books so soon after each other, because it's like . . .
THUD: Guess what! Dwarves have wacky fundamentalist customs and don't want to integrate with Ankh-Morpork society!
BECCA: Oh, wait, again?
THUD: No, I mean different and EVEN MORE fundamentalist customs!
BECCA: I repeat: again?
Like, without even attempting to look at the Dwarves vs. Trolls Isn't Racial Hatred Terrible storyline through any kind of critical lens, I'm just kind of tired of dwarvish customs and society being retconned for use as the Metaphor Of The Week! I realize it is an exercise in futility to complain about continuity in Discworld, but NONETHELESS.
I am also -- and I never thought I would say this -- a little tired of The Power of Vimes' Internal Policeman, because, yes, okay, we know.
Which is not to say the ending doesn't work, because yes, the image of dead kings playing board games is super powerful, FINE, Terry Pratchett, you got me there. And it's not that I don't enjoy Angua, Sally and Cheery's Night Out, although that basically feels like extended fanfic about The Watch Girls Having a Night Out, but I'm okay with extended fanfic, I guess. And every time Sybil appears onscreen and/or reveals an undiscovered talent I am sent into a spin of wild delight. So I enjoyed Thud, there are lots of things I enjoyed, but . . . I'm okay with almost being out of Watch books.
But today it is time to talk about Thud, which . . . hmmm. I remember really liking Thud when it first came out, especially after being less than one hundred percent impressed with Going Postal -- I think because it fit my impression of How Discworld Books Went for comfort reading, which Going Postal did not at the time -- and now my feelings appear to have switched?
It's not that I didn't enjoy Thud, but -- well, and maybe this is a function of reading all the books so soon after each other, because it's like . . .
THUD: Guess what! Dwarves have wacky fundamentalist customs and don't want to integrate with Ankh-Morpork society!
BECCA: Oh, wait, again?
THUD: No, I mean different and EVEN MORE fundamentalist customs!
BECCA: I repeat: again?
Like, without even attempting to look at the Dwarves vs. Trolls Isn't Racial Hatred Terrible storyline through any kind of critical lens, I'm just kind of tired of dwarvish customs and society being retconned for use as the Metaphor Of The Week! I realize it is an exercise in futility to complain about continuity in Discworld, but NONETHELESS.
I am also -- and I never thought I would say this -- a little tired of The Power of Vimes' Internal Policeman, because, yes, okay, we know.
Which is not to say the ending doesn't work, because yes, the image of dead kings playing board games is super powerful, FINE, Terry Pratchett, you got me there. And it's not that I don't enjoy Angua, Sally and Cheery's Night Out, although that basically feels like extended fanfic about The Watch Girls Having a Night Out, but I'm okay with extended fanfic, I guess. And every time Sybil appears onscreen and/or reveals an undiscovered talent I am sent into a spin of wild delight. So I enjoyed Thud, there are lots of things I enjoyed, but . . . I'm okay with almost being out of Watch books.
no subject
Date: 2013-04-29 03:24 pm (UTC)I liked Sally, but she felt incidental to the plot, and I'll be honest, I never figured out what the book was about. I mean, even when Pterry's being horribly offensive, you usually know what he's being offensive about. What is he trying to say with Thud?
no subject
Date: 2013-04-29 04:29 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2013-04-29 03:31 pm (UTC)I remember enjoying it when I read it but I haven't reread it. I don't seem to reread the newer books as much as the older ones.
no subject
Date: 2013-04-29 04:32 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2013-04-29 04:38 pm (UTC)I think he figured it out by the time he got to Snuff and Unseen Academicals, but this one was where it was obvious how and what he's writing about has been shifting. I still don't tend to reread the newer books as much as I do the older ones.
no subject
Date: 2013-04-29 06:08 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2013-04-29 06:13 pm (UTC)They both felt more English to me than others of his books and I found that helped them. I'll be curious to hear your thoughts.
no subject
Date: 2013-04-29 04:22 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2013-04-29 04:34 pm (UTC)I like Fifth Elephant, but as was said above I think this book just kind of . . . redoes Fifth Elephant in a lot of ways, a little bit less coherent and a little bit worse.
no subject
Date: 2013-04-29 04:44 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2013-04-29 06:08 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2013-05-22 03:27 pm (UTC)