(no subject)
May. 30th, 2016 09:19 pmBarbara Hambly's Dragonsbane was one of the first books I ever put on my Kindle but I only got round to reading it last week, I don't know why, it just felt like the stars had aligned.
Dragonsbane, definitely written in the eighties, is a fairly intentional deconstruction of Heroic Dragonslaying Tropes, ft. as protagonist Jenny Waynest, a middle-aged witch who is constantly having Relatable Struggles Between Her Career and Her Family, which is to say between having enough study time tocomplete her dissertation become truly excellent at magic and the distractions of her boyfriend and their two kids. Aforementioned boyfriend, John Aversin, happens to be the lord of a fairly impoverished region and also the only living person to have ever slain a dragon (with significant assist from Jenny.)
This becomes relevant when a naive baby knight named Gareth comes riding up demanding help to slay a dragon.
NAIVE BABY KNIGHT GARETH: I am here to request the aid of the GREATEST hero in ALL THE LAND --
JOHN: Yes sorry pardon all the mud etc. but we are a very small holding here and I am busy with the pigs?
JENNY: Hey babe, long time no see, how are the kids?
JOHN: Oh, fine, fine, hope your months alone studying witchcraft in the woods went well?
NAIVE BABY KNIGHT GARETH: Pigs? Witches? Illegitimate children?
JENNY: Kiddo do you maybe need a moment to go off and clutch your pearls --
NAIVE BABY KNIGHT GARETH: YES, WITCH HARLOT, YES I DO.
Anyway, although John is reluctant to leave the pigs etc. to go kill somebody else's dragon, baby knight Gareth promises gratitude and significant financial aid from the king for the impoverished region if the quest is completed, so Jenny & John & naive baby knight Gareth ride off a-questing!
The first approximate third of the book after this is basically just The Road Trip That Shattered The Last Of Poor Baby Gareth's Illusions. However it soon turns out that what is ACTUALLY plaguing the land is the king's evil sorceress mistress who is evil, very evil, one hundred percent evil, you never can trust the pretty ones (my one complaint with the book) and the dragon is just sort of a byproduct to this, although still a byproduct that needs to be sorted out one way or another.
But, I mean, the whole political/magical plot is kind of all just a narrative excuse to force Jenny to resolve the central question of her life anyway -- whether to pursue various opportunities at power & magical knowledge & freedom (including an offer from an unexpectedly smitten dragon who's like 'RUN AWAY WITH ME, JENNY, TURN INTO A DRAGON AND RUN AWAY WITH ME TO LIVE YOUR BEST AND MOST DRAGON-TASTIC LIFE!' and honestly who among us would not find this tempting) or whether she can continue with the life she's currently leading, constantly torn between her personal potential and the needs of the people who love her, whom she loves as well, but also can't help but resent.
Which: it sucks that this is a binary choice, but I can't say the dilemma isn't real. The choice is never easy and the answer is never obvious, and I spent most of the book unsure myself what I wanted Jenny to do, which really is the biggest mark of success for this book.
A sidenote: I am told this book has sequels that should NEVER, EVER BE READ. So I am not going to read them, but the people who have read them and explicitly told me not to read them (I'm looking at you,
rachelmanija and
coffeeandink) could maybe make it easier for me by satisfying my horrible curiosity in detailed ROT13 or something in comments. >.>
Dragonsbane, definitely written in the eighties, is a fairly intentional deconstruction of Heroic Dragonslaying Tropes, ft. as protagonist Jenny Waynest, a middle-aged witch who is constantly having Relatable Struggles Between Her Career and Her Family, which is to say between having enough study time to
This becomes relevant when a naive baby knight named Gareth comes riding up demanding help to slay a dragon.
NAIVE BABY KNIGHT GARETH: I am here to request the aid of the GREATEST hero in ALL THE LAND --
JOHN: Yes sorry pardon all the mud etc. but we are a very small holding here and I am busy with the pigs?
JENNY: Hey babe, long time no see, how are the kids?
JOHN: Oh, fine, fine, hope your months alone studying witchcraft in the woods went well?
NAIVE BABY KNIGHT GARETH: Pigs? Witches? Illegitimate children?
JENNY: Kiddo do you maybe need a moment to go off and clutch your pearls --
NAIVE BABY KNIGHT GARETH: YES, WITCH HARLOT, YES I DO.
Anyway, although John is reluctant to leave the pigs etc. to go kill somebody else's dragon, baby knight Gareth promises gratitude and significant financial aid from the king for the impoverished region if the quest is completed, so Jenny & John & naive baby knight Gareth ride off a-questing!
The first approximate third of the book after this is basically just The Road Trip That Shattered The Last Of Poor Baby Gareth's Illusions. However it soon turns out that what is ACTUALLY plaguing the land is the king's evil sorceress mistress who is evil, very evil, one hundred percent evil, you never can trust the pretty ones (my one complaint with the book) and the dragon is just sort of a byproduct to this, although still a byproduct that needs to be sorted out one way or another.
But, I mean, the whole political/magical plot is kind of all just a narrative excuse to force Jenny to resolve the central question of her life anyway -- whether to pursue various opportunities at power & magical knowledge & freedom (including an offer from an unexpectedly smitten dragon who's like 'RUN AWAY WITH ME, JENNY, TURN INTO A DRAGON AND RUN AWAY WITH ME TO LIVE YOUR BEST AND MOST DRAGON-TASTIC LIFE!' and honestly who among us would not find this tempting) or whether she can continue with the life she's currently leading, constantly torn between her personal potential and the needs of the people who love her, whom she loves as well, but also can't help but resent.
Which: it sucks that this is a binary choice, but I can't say the dilemma isn't real. The choice is never easy and the answer is never obvious, and I spent most of the book unsure myself what I wanted Jenny to do, which really is the biggest mark of success for this book.
A sidenote: I am told this book has sequels that should NEVER, EVER BE READ. So I am not going to read them, but the people who have read them and explicitly told me not to read them (I'm looking at you,
no subject
Date: 2016-05-31 03:29 am (UTC)Um. Apparently I have Feelings--sorry for that very long sentence, but I'm not sure how to rewrite it better at the moment without making this clumsy comment even longer.
no subject
Date: 2016-05-31 04:19 am (UTC)It is a definitely an eighties book, one can tell that it is an eighties book, but also I cannot think of a book that does the same thing as well now, and the choices are still very much the same.
no subject
Date: 2016-05-31 05:51 am (UTC)Yes, sadly.
no subject
Date: 2016-05-31 04:48 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2016-05-31 11:24 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2016-05-31 07:53 am (UTC)I know I read this book in high school and I have vague positive feelings toward it, but I can remember absolutely nothing about it except for descriptions of the quality of light and somebody's glasses.
no subject
Date: 2016-05-31 11:39 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2016-05-31 08:25 am (UTC)I'm looking at you smurfs (not their real name). And the other weird nasties in the same area that there doesn't seem to be any defence against. Scared me for quite a long time, those.
no subject
Date: 2016-05-31 11:43 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2016-06-02 02:57 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2016-05-31 12:41 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2016-05-31 11:43 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2016-05-31 02:25 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2016-05-31 11:44 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2016-05-31 04:14 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2016-05-31 11:45 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2016-05-31 08:23 pm (UTC)Dragonshadow is hideously depressing. The OTHER sequels cross time and space and worlds to Earth and are AWFUL. AVOID.
no subject
Date: 2016-05-31 11:49 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2016-06-06 07:28 am (UTC)Gurer ner fhqqrayl qrzbaf sbe ab ernfba, va n havirefr juvpu unq abg cerivbhfyl orra zragvbarq gb unir qrzbaf. Gurer'f n qrzba dhrra jubz Wbua purngf ba Wraal jvgu, nyfb abg ernyyl sbe nal ernfba bgure guna orpnhfr jr ner fhqqrayl va n tevzqnex NH. Wraal vf fbzrubj frireryl ohearq naq ubeevsvpnyyl qvfsvtherq. Wbua naq Wraavr ungr gurzfryirf naq rnpu bgure.
Gura gurl tb gb YN. V sbetrg jul be jung unccraf gurer. Znlor Zbexryro ernccrnef? Naljnl, rirelguvat vf ubeevoyr sbe guerr obbxf, ohg ng gur irel raq bs obbx guerr Unzoyl frrzf gb pbzr gb ure frafrf, guvax, "Jung unir V qbar?" naq unfgvyl gevrf gb ergpba/qent n uncclvfu raqvat bhg bs gur qvfnfgre.
Yvxr V fnvq, nf sne nf V'z pbaprearq, gubfr obbxf QB ABG RKVFG. Gurer vf fbzr ernyyl fgenatr, BBP, abiry-yratgu qnexsvp bhg gurer juvpu vf fnqyl gur bayl svp V'ir frra.
no subject
Date: 2016-06-06 07:31 am (UTC)