(no subject)
Oct. 18th, 2017 07:40 pm![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
skygiantsI didn't deliberately read up on seventeenth-century English history history in preparation for A Skinful of Shadows; it was just a fortunate coincidence that I'd just finished Aphra Behn: A Secret Life right beforehand (thanks to saramily, who came into possession of the book and shoved it into my hands.)
The thing about the English Civil War and everything that surrounds it is that it's remarkably difficult to pick a team, from the modern perspective. On the one side, you've got Puritans and repressive morality and NO PLAYS OR GOOD TIMES FOR ANYONE, but also democracy and egalitarianism and a rejection of the divine right of kings and the aristocracy! On the other side, you've got GLORY IN THE DIVINELY ORDAINED KING AND THE PERFECTION OF THE ESTABLISHED SOCIAL ORDER, but also people can have a good time every once in a while and make sex jokes if they feel like it.
Anyway, one fact that seems pretty certain about Aphra Behn is that she grew up during the Interregnum and wrote during the Restoration, and was very much on Team Divine Kings Are Great. Would Puritans let a woman write saucy plays for the stage? NO SIRREE, NOT AT ALL, three cheers for the monarchy and the dissolute aristocracy!
There aren't all that many facts that are certain about Aphra Behn, especially her early years -- the first several chapters of this book involve a lot of posed hypotheticals about who she might have been, how she might have got her start, and who might have recruited her into the spying business. It does seem fairly certain she was a spy: code name Astrea, Agent 160. (Me, toaamcnamara, after seeing Or last month: "I don't know that I buy all that Agent 160 business, there's no way that was something they did in the 1660s!" I apologize for doubting you, Liz Duffy Adams.)
Admittedly she was the kind of spy who spent most of her spy mission stuck in a hotel in Antwerp writing irritated letters back to King Charles' intelligence bureaucracy, explaining that she would happily continue with her spying mission and do all the things they wished her to do if only they would send her enough money to PAY HER DANG HOTEL BILL. (They did not.)
Besides her unpaid expense reports, most of what is known about Aphra Behn comes from her context and her publications, and the things she wrote in them -- only some of which can absolutely definitively be traced to her at all; several of her short stories and novellas are disputed, including one of the ones I found most interesting, "Love-Letters Between A Nobleman And His Sister." This early three-volume novel is extremely thinly-veiled RPF about a wildly trashy historical trial involving King Charles' illegitimate son, his best friend, the best friend's wife, and the best friend's sister-in-law. All of these people then went on to be involved in a major rebellion, which the second and third volume of "Love-Letters" cheerfully fictionalizes basically as it was happening, in the real world.
One of the first English novels ever written by a woman [if it was indeed written by Aphra Behn], and arguably the first novel written EVER, and it's basically one of Chuck Tingle's political satires. This is kind of amazing to me.
OK, but back to things we think we're fairly sure we do know about Aphra Behn! She wrote a lot about herself talking, and about men judging her for how much she talked; she wrote a lot of things that were extremely homoerotic; she also wrote a lot about impotence; she was often short on money; she cheerfully stole other people's plots, then got mad when people accused her of stealing other people's plots; she rarely wrote anything that was traditionally romantic, and most of her work seems to have an extremely wicked bite to it. She did not read Latin, which did not stop her from contributing to volumes of translations of things from Latin. She was almost certainly not a member of the nobility, but she believed in divine right, and divine order, and divine King Charles, even though it seems likely from her writing that she did not believe personally in religion, or God, and the King probably never did pay her bills. An extremely interesting and contradictory person, living in an interesting and contradictory time.
And now I think I need to go find a good biography of Nell Gwyn - she's barely relevant to this biography (Aphra Behn dedicated a play to her, but there's no other information available about their relationship) and yet Janet Todd cannot resist throwing in a couple of her favorite historical Nell Gwyn one-liners and they're all SO GOOD.
saramily, who came into possession of the book and shoved it into my hands.) The thing about the English Civil War and everything that surrounds it is that it's remarkably difficult to pick a team, from the modern perspective. On the one side, you've got Puritans and repressive morality and NO PLAYS OR GOOD TIMES FOR ANYONE, but also democracy and egalitarianism and a rejection of the divine right of kings and the aristocracy! On the other side, you've got GLORY IN THE DIVINELY ORDAINED KING AND THE PERFECTION OF THE ESTABLISHED SOCIAL ORDER, but also people can have a good time every once in a while and make sex jokes if they feel like it.
Anyway, one fact that seems pretty certain about Aphra Behn is that she grew up during the Interregnum and wrote during the Restoration, and was very much on Team Divine Kings Are Great. Would Puritans let a woman write saucy plays for the stage? NO SIRREE, NOT AT ALL, three cheers for the monarchy and the dissolute aristocracy!
There aren't all that many facts that are certain about Aphra Behn, especially her early years -- the first several chapters of this book involve a lot of posed hypotheticals about who she might have been, how she might have got her start, and who might have recruited her into the spying business. It does seem fairly certain she was a spy: code name Astrea, Agent 160. (Me, to
aamcnamara, after seeing Or last month: "I don't know that I buy all that Agent 160 business, there's no way that was something they did in the 1660s!" I apologize for doubting you, Liz Duffy Adams.)Admittedly she was the kind of spy who spent most of her spy mission stuck in a hotel in Antwerp writing irritated letters back to King Charles' intelligence bureaucracy, explaining that she would happily continue with her spying mission and do all the things they wished her to do if only they would send her enough money to PAY HER DANG HOTEL BILL. (They did not.)
Besides her unpaid expense reports, most of what is known about Aphra Behn comes from her context and her publications, and the things she wrote in them -- only some of which can absolutely definitively be traced to her at all; several of her short stories and novellas are disputed, including one of the ones I found most interesting, "Love-Letters Between A Nobleman And His Sister." This early three-volume novel is extremely thinly-veiled RPF about a wildly trashy historical trial involving King Charles' illegitimate son, his best friend, the best friend's wife, and the best friend's sister-in-law. All of these people then went on to be involved in a major rebellion, which the second and third volume of "Love-Letters" cheerfully fictionalizes basically as it was happening, in the real world.
One of the first English novels ever written by a woman [if it was indeed written by Aphra Behn], and arguably the first novel written EVER, and it's basically one of Chuck Tingle's political satires. This is kind of amazing to me.
OK, but back to things we think we're fairly sure we do know about Aphra Behn! She wrote a lot about herself talking, and about men judging her for how much she talked; she wrote a lot of things that were extremely homoerotic; she also wrote a lot about impotence; she was often short on money; she cheerfully stole other people's plots, then got mad when people accused her of stealing other people's plots; she rarely wrote anything that was traditionally romantic, and most of her work seems to have an extremely wicked bite to it. She did not read Latin, which did not stop her from contributing to volumes of translations of things from Latin. She was almost certainly not a member of the nobility, but she believed in divine right, and divine order, and divine King Charles, even though it seems likely from her writing that she did not believe personally in religion, or God, and the King probably never did pay her bills. An extremely interesting and contradictory person, living in an interesting and contradictory time.
And now I think I need to go find a good biography of Nell Gwyn - she's barely relevant to this biography (Aphra Behn dedicated a play to her, but there's no other information available about their relationship) and yet Janet Todd cannot resist throwing in a couple of her favorite historical Nell Gwyn one-liners and they're all SO GOOD.
no subject
Date: 2017-10-19 12:56 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2017-10-19 12:57 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2017-10-19 02:56 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2017-10-20 03:58 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2017-10-19 03:29 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2017-10-20 03:58 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2017-10-19 03:53 am (UTC)This is interesting, because my collected volumes of Aphra Behn's plays are much less equivocal about what is known about her life.
no subject
Date: 2017-10-20 04:00 am (UTC)I'm curious now, what do your volumes present as factual?
no subject
Date: 2017-10-20 04:02 am (UTC)I mean, I read those plays years ago and they're in storage, but my memory is that they basically present all the stuff you said was unclear as "yup, totally happened!," especially some of her authorship claims.
no subject
Date: 2017-10-19 04:35 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2017-10-19 08:11 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2017-10-19 07:13 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2017-10-20 04:00 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2017-10-19 05:00 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2017-10-19 06:42 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2017-10-20 04:11 am (UTC)What surprised me most in reading about The Rover is that Aphra Behn wrote a sequel in which she blithely killed the heroine off offscreen so that the Rover could have more adventures in being appalling.
no subject
Date: 2017-10-19 06:42 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2017-10-20 04:02 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2017-10-19 10:02 am (UTC)-- oooh possibility of Aphra/Nell historical RPF! Maybe for next Yuletide....
no subject
Date: 2017-10-20 04:12 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2017-10-20 04:23 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2017-10-19 02:42 pm (UTC)(One thing that I enjoyed, apart from the story itself, was the historical note at the beginning, in which the author apologizes for having bent history slightly in order that all the awesome historical women in the story might be in the same place at the same time. The transgression confessed to is considerably less than the amount of damage Dumas did to history in The Three Musketeers without ever thinking to apologize for it.)
no subject
Date: 2017-10-20 04:12 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2017-10-20 04:34 am (UTC)(On the other hand, I haven't read any of the Alpennia books yet either, so I don't know for sure that they don't feature Aphra Behn.)
no subject
Date: 2017-10-20 04:03 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2017-10-19 03:29 pm (UTC)I actually prefer Behn's poetry to her plays and prose, possibly not so oddly enough. She's ... very Restotation, what with works like The Disappointment (which, alas, turns out to be an adaptation of a French poem -- the original was from the male POV, and goes on with more winging at the end) and To the Fair Clarinda, Who Made Love to Me.
no subject
Date: 2017-10-20 04:17 am (UTC)To the Fair Clarinda is such a delight. *__*
no subject
Date: 2017-10-20 04:01 pm (UTC)Behn takes the femslash in To the Fair Clarinda exactly as far as she can get away with before backing off with a wave to due convention. It's glorious coding.
(I assume you know the famous contemporary poem about wearing women's underwear on your head?) (Yes, I know, at the time it meant a sash. IT LOOKS LIKE UNDERWEAR WHERE I'M SITTING.)
(And then there's Herrick's tentacle porn.)
(I love 17th century smut verse.)
no subject
Date: 2017-10-20 10:08 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2017-10-19 05:11 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2017-10-20 04:19 am (UTC)