(no subject)
Jan. 6th, 2009 10:09 am![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
skygiantsNow I know some of you guys know this guy from various televisiony places; my personal reaction when he popped up onstage at the play I was seeing last night was "SURPRIES MACBETH! . . . I wonder if there will be a stripping scene?" (Sadly, there was not.)
The play, for the record, was Women Beware Women, which I read for class last spring. The DEATH BY FLAMING PROJECTILE MOLTEN GOLD did not disappoint! Nor did Hera descending from the clouds like a hilariously murderous Glinda the Good Witch, nor did everyone falling over and dying in agony and shouting "MURDER, FOUL MURDER" while Duke Macbeth looked very put out and complained that this play made no sense at all. I did not remember the bit where the priest got gorily stabbed in the neck with his own cross, so possibly they put that in as an extra awesome bonus! I am not complaining.
The costuming was alternately amazing and terrible; the very cool bits involved a Jacobean gown designed to bring to mind a 1950's housewife dress and an ingenue-boy wearing a sweater-vest under his frock coat, the terrible bits involved sausage curls and purple ruffles and calico. WHY GOD WHY. Duke Macbeth got a fabulously pimpin' coat, though. I am not sure whether the Glinda outfit counts as amazing or terrible, or maybe both! The scenery was also pretty opulent, but the play itself, while often hilarious, just was not sexy enough. When you are doing Jacobean tragedy I tend to feel that dark and sinister sexiness is a must. Farce is great, but . . . there is such a thing as too much (I know, you never thought you would hear me say that.)
And while I'm here talking about The Theater, I am just going to put in a shout-out to my favorite play of all time, Christopher Fry's The Lady's Not For Burning, which I just reread and found that I still love with the fire of a thousand thousand suns. It's about logic and reality and wonder and words and why on earth someone would walk into a courthouse and demand to be hanged (putting everyone to terrible inconvenience in the process). "What greater superstition is there than the mumbo-jumbo of believing in reality?" is one of my favorite quotes ever, also. Basically it is a joy from start to finish, not to mention hilarious, and everyone should read it who does not mind twisty verse.
The play, for the record, was Women Beware Women, which I read for class last spring. The DEATH BY FLAMING PROJECTILE MOLTEN GOLD did not disappoint! Nor did Hera descending from the clouds like a hilariously murderous Glinda the Good Witch, nor did everyone falling over and dying in agony and shouting "MURDER, FOUL MURDER" while Duke Macbeth looked very put out and complained that this play made no sense at all. I did not remember the bit where the priest got gorily stabbed in the neck with his own cross, so possibly they put that in as an extra awesome bonus! I am not complaining.
The costuming was alternately amazing and terrible; the very cool bits involved a Jacobean gown designed to bring to mind a 1950's housewife dress and an ingenue-boy wearing a sweater-vest under his frock coat, the terrible bits involved sausage curls and purple ruffles and calico. WHY GOD WHY. Duke Macbeth got a fabulously pimpin' coat, though. I am not sure whether the Glinda outfit counts as amazing or terrible, or maybe both! The scenery was also pretty opulent, but the play itself, while often hilarious, just was not sexy enough. When you are doing Jacobean tragedy I tend to feel that dark and sinister sexiness is a must. Farce is great, but . . . there is such a thing as too much (I know, you never thought you would hear me say that.)
And while I'm here talking about The Theater, I am just going to put in a shout-out to my favorite play of all time, Christopher Fry's The Lady's Not For Burning, which I just reread and found that I still love with the fire of a thousand thousand suns. It's about logic and reality and wonder and words and why on earth someone would walk into a courthouse and demand to be hanged (putting everyone to terrible inconvenience in the process). "What greater superstition is there than the mumbo-jumbo of believing in reality?" is one of my favorite quotes ever, also. Basically it is a joy from start to finish, not to mention hilarious, and everyone should read it who does not mind twisty verse.
![[identity profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/openid.png){kind=small}
no subject
Date: 2009-01-06 04:04 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-01-06 04:10 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-01-06 04:26 pm (UTC)And am going to die.
Of squee.
I totally haven't been fangirling him since I was 11. Totally.no subject
Date: 2009-01-06 04:29 pm (UTC)(And, uh, sorry for spoiling the end for you. NOT EVERYONE DIES REALLY.)
no subject
Date: 2009-01-06 04:33 pm (UTC)And I totally will.
If I survive the squee.
...you do realize that the only dream I've ever had with him in it involved him coming to be a speaker at my school chapel and me FAINTING when he came out, waking up to see him checking me over, and then FAINTING AGAIN upon seeing who was looking me over.
Right?
And then Jacobean crack! That's like... the icing on an already fantastic awesome-filled cake.
no subject
Date: 2009-01-06 04:37 pm (UTC)*and cracks up* BE CAREFUL IF YOU FAINT. At this show people might think you have been murdered by POISONED INCENSE! Also I will feel guilty if I inadertently cause your death, EVEN IF it is Death By Squee.
no subject
Date: 2009-01-06 04:43 pm (UTC)Hopefully, Sherri will keep me alive by pointing out that I have, in fact, met Bruce Campbell twice without expiring.
no subject
Date: 2009-01-06 04:45 pm (UTC). . . I'm not helping, am I. Um. I REITERATE: DON'T DIE. Even if it's a cracktastic Jacobean death, poisoned helmets and paintings and skulls and tennis rackets are funny for the audience but not so funny for the participant!
no subject
Date: 2009-01-06 05:03 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-01-06 05:10 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-01-06 05:31 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-01-06 04:05 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-01-06 04:12 pm (UTC). . . HAH! I totally want to see that just for the hilarity factor. (I bet he would do a really good Macbeth, to be honest.)