(no subject)
Dec. 26th, 2022 02:56 pmIt took me ages to actually get around to reading Nona the Ninth because I was grimly determined to reread Harrow the Ninth first, a book I respected but did not particularly enjoy on my first read.
On my second read I had more patience for HtN -- as I suspected, knowing what's going on and being able to go slow and look out for the interesting clues the narrative is laying with an eye to what they actually signify made for a better reading experience than zooming through the book with ferocious impatience while dodging piles of glistening viscera -- but it is still and I think will always be a book that is more interesting than enjoyable for me.
Nona the Ninth, on the other hand, I both respected and enjoyed enormously! tbh I think one of Muir's greatest talents as a storyteller is her refusal to let any person or group of people become stock characters -- obviously much of the interest of the narrative comes from the truly wild worldbuilding and the puzzlebox nature of the way that it's revealed but an equal amount of it derives naturally from layering a huge cast all of whom do genuinely have distinct goals and viewpoints over and over and over each other before steamrolling them flat with plot to create an enormous and delicious Goth croissant. The best part of Harrow for me was the way it returned to characters from the first book who had little chance to express a viewpoint and gave them more and different opportunities to make unexpected choices. The best part of Nona, for me, is the fact that it is set in a society of refugees who hate necromancers, and the people we are spending some of the most time with are refugee kids who are not at all important in the grand scheme of the plot and have nothing to do with the epic scope of the narrative but are important to our viewpoint character and so they are important to the narrative regardless.
Obviously I also liked seeing the returning characters again and getting a strictly limited third person's eye view on characters who are now familiar enough to me that I can put together implications from things the viewpoint character observes but does not understand is a very enjoyable way for me to read, especially now that I trust Muir enough to believe that every character is going to have interesting layers to their story sooner or later .... I guess technically 'getting a strictly limited third person's eye view about things the viewpoint character observes but does not understand' was also true of Harrow but it frustrated me there and delighted me here, no shade to Harrow.
( vague but still technically spoilery details )
So, overall, three books in ... I am engaged! I am invested! I'm on board!! It's probably also relevant that this is the least meme-y book yet and I do want to thank Tamsyn Muir for that ... I do not wish to deny her joy but I did need it. Just a little break. A breather. An opportunity to relax into a chapter without bracing to be absolutely bodyslammed by Essence of Tumblr 2014.
On my second read I had more patience for HtN -- as I suspected, knowing what's going on and being able to go slow and look out for the interesting clues the narrative is laying with an eye to what they actually signify made for a better reading experience than zooming through the book with ferocious impatience while dodging piles of glistening viscera -- but it is still and I think will always be a book that is more interesting than enjoyable for me.
Nona the Ninth, on the other hand, I both respected and enjoyed enormously! tbh I think one of Muir's greatest talents as a storyteller is her refusal to let any person or group of people become stock characters -- obviously much of the interest of the narrative comes from the truly wild worldbuilding and the puzzlebox nature of the way that it's revealed but an equal amount of it derives naturally from layering a huge cast all of whom do genuinely have distinct goals and viewpoints over and over and over each other before steamrolling them flat with plot to create an enormous and delicious Goth croissant. The best part of Harrow for me was the way it returned to characters from the first book who had little chance to express a viewpoint and gave them more and different opportunities to make unexpected choices. The best part of Nona, for me, is the fact that it is set in a society of refugees who hate necromancers, and the people we are spending some of the most time with are refugee kids who are not at all important in the grand scheme of the plot and have nothing to do with the epic scope of the narrative but are important to our viewpoint character and so they are important to the narrative regardless.
Obviously I also liked seeing the returning characters again and getting a strictly limited third person's eye view on characters who are now familiar enough to me that I can put together implications from things the viewpoint character observes but does not understand is a very enjoyable way for me to read, especially now that I trust Muir enough to believe that every character is going to have interesting layers to their story sooner or later .... I guess technically 'getting a strictly limited third person's eye view about things the viewpoint character observes but does not understand' was also true of Harrow but it frustrated me there and delighted me here, no shade to Harrow.
( vague but still technically spoilery details )
So, overall, three books in ... I am engaged! I am invested! I'm on board!! It's probably also relevant that this is the least meme-y book yet and I do want to thank Tamsyn Muir for that ... I do not wish to deny her joy but I did need it. Just a little break. A breather. An opportunity to relax into a chapter without bracing to be absolutely bodyslammed by Essence of Tumblr 2014.