(no subject)
Sep. 23rd, 2010 11:43 am![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
First, an OFFICIAL-TYPE ANNOUNCEMENT for
fma_ladyfest types:
genarti reminds me that we are halfway through the writing period, and probably should make mention of this! And thefore I would like to take a moment to remind people that there are two weeks left to finish (or start) your brilliant assignments and send them in to us. A few people have already sent stuff in; Gen and I are united in thinking that these people are AWESOME and also being a little bit terrified of them. (But, you say, as mods, surely you guys should already have your fics done and betaed well in advance and be prepared to dive into the process of being responsible and organizational! I think we would also be united in responding to you with hollow laughter.)
Something in which Gen and I are not united: our reading habits. Every few months Gen and I have the same discussion, and it goes something like this:
BECCA: Well, I will read this book that you recommend to me next time I have a slot for it in my reading quota system, which should be . . . hmmm, approximately four book from now.
GEN: I find your reading quota system strange and lolarious.
BECCA: See, if I did not mentally schedule my reading, I would pretty much just always read YA fantasy and never read nonfiction at all. And I want to read nonfiction, because learning things is useful and interesting, but it has less immediate appeal to me when I am grabbing the first book to catch my eye.
GEN: I do not understand this problem of yours. Nonfiction catches my eye all the time, it is enormously appealing! It is much more guaranteed to be interesting than fiction.
BECCA: But . . . plot! And characters! Make things much easier to read! Boring nonfiction is a lot harder to get through than boring fiction.
GEN: But if a novel is boring or frustrating, then it's just pointless and I don't care. At least in nonfiction you are guaranteed to learn some facts!
BECCA: BUT WHAT IF THEY'RE BORING FACTS, GEN. WHAT THEN.
Despite giving myself the last word in this fictionalized version of our debate, I think Gen probably has the moral high ground in this argument. But I stand by my position all the same.
As a partial result of these differing literary worldviews, pretty much every time Gen and I see each other, I foist some fantasy off on her and she foists some nonfiction off on me. The most recent trade ended up in me reading Women in the Middle Ages: The Lives of Real Women in a Vibrant Age of Transition. Fortunately this is not the kind of nonfiction book that is full of boring facts! The first half is pretty 101 on The Middle Ages, These Were Women's Roles, They Were More Interesting Than you Might Think; the second half is more specific, and traces the documented lives of some actual ladies, ranging from politically powerful noblewomen to guildswomen suing their employers to upwardly mobile merchant's wives defending their lands from siege by their neighbors. I wouldn't recommend it to the medievalists on here, but for someone who doesn't know that much about the era - or would just like a better idea of some of the scope available for a lady at that time period - it's pretty interesting. I don't really have that much more to say about it, though, so, instead: a poll!
[Poll #1622741]
![[livejournal.com profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/external/lj-community.gif)
![[livejournal.com profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/external/lj-userinfo.gif)
Something in which Gen and I are not united: our reading habits. Every few months Gen and I have the same discussion, and it goes something like this:
BECCA: Well, I will read this book that you recommend to me next time I have a slot for it in my reading quota system, which should be . . . hmmm, approximately four book from now.
GEN: I find your reading quota system strange and lolarious.
BECCA: See, if I did not mentally schedule my reading, I would pretty much just always read YA fantasy and never read nonfiction at all. And I want to read nonfiction, because learning things is useful and interesting, but it has less immediate appeal to me when I am grabbing the first book to catch my eye.
GEN: I do not understand this problem of yours. Nonfiction catches my eye all the time, it is enormously appealing! It is much more guaranteed to be interesting than fiction.
BECCA: But . . . plot! And characters! Make things much easier to read! Boring nonfiction is a lot harder to get through than boring fiction.
GEN: But if a novel is boring or frustrating, then it's just pointless and I don't care. At least in nonfiction you are guaranteed to learn some facts!
BECCA: BUT WHAT IF THEY'RE BORING FACTS, GEN. WHAT THEN.
Despite giving myself the last word in this fictionalized version of our debate, I think Gen probably has the moral high ground in this argument. But I stand by my position all the same.
As a partial result of these differing literary worldviews, pretty much every time Gen and I see each other, I foist some fantasy off on her and she foists some nonfiction off on me. The most recent trade ended up in me reading Women in the Middle Ages: The Lives of Real Women in a Vibrant Age of Transition. Fortunately this is not the kind of nonfiction book that is full of boring facts! The first half is pretty 101 on The Middle Ages, These Were Women's Roles, They Were More Interesting Than you Might Think; the second half is more specific, and traces the documented lives of some actual ladies, ranging from politically powerful noblewomen to guildswomen suing their employers to upwardly mobile merchant's wives defending their lands from siege by their neighbors. I wouldn't recommend it to the medievalists on here, but for someone who doesn't know that much about the era - or would just like a better idea of some of the scope available for a lady at that time period - it's pretty interesting. I don't really have that much more to say about it, though, so, instead: a poll!
[Poll #1622741]
no subject
Date: 2010-09-23 03:47 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-09-23 03:48 pm (UTC)I am a massive dork.
no subject
Date: 2010-09-23 03:50 pm (UTC)And I would be interested in the history of courtesans in England, if you happen to have a rec that way. I'm just saying. >.>
no subject
Date: 2010-09-23 03:50 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-09-23 03:55 pm (UTC)I also then realized that there are topics out there that I am actually interested in reading nonfiction about. So that helps!
So basically, I read both. TAKE THAT.
no subject
Date: 2010-09-23 03:55 pm (UTC)It is on my bookshelf at home and has a different cover, but I thiiink it is this one (http://www.amazon.co.uk/Courtesans-Katie-Hickman/dp/0007113927").
no subject
Date: 2010-09-23 04:01 pm (UTC)If nonfiction can just pick up some plot and characters and MAKE IT SOUND EXCITING I'm pretty sure I'd read so much more nonfic.
As it is ... FICTION ALL THE WAY.
I like pretty prose and characters to root for! I CANNOT RESIST.
no subject
Date: 2010-09-23 04:03 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-09-23 04:09 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-09-23 04:09 pm (UTC)Perhaps unsurprisingly, if you asked me to choose a book I will pick nonfiction over fiction at least 90 percent of the time. Even my fiction choices tend to have some sort of Historical Significance -- off the top of my head, the most recent works of fiction I've read were Mikhail Bulgakov's The Master and Margarita (Satan visits the Soviet Union), Anthony Trollope's The Way We Live Now (thinly veiled satire on Victorian financial and political intrigue), and Solzhenitsyn's The Cancer Ward (cancer as metaphor for Soviet power). And that doesn't seem to be changing much if I look at my book queue.
If I had to give a reason why, I think it's because (a) I do a lot of historical research on my own time, and (b) I get my fiction fix through manga and anime. I suppose I should have considered (b) more when making my radio button choice, since it would make my choices more equal, but I consider manga/anime a slightly separate genre from the standard dead-tree book reading.
no subject
Date: 2010-09-23 04:10 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-09-23 04:10 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-09-23 04:11 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-09-23 04:11 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-09-23 04:12 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-09-23 04:12 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-09-23 04:15 pm (UTC)Interestingly, when it's what I produce (at least within my own head) it's not a lot of characters or plot, but rather Physics/Metaphysics Geekiness.
no subject
Date: 2010-09-23 04:21 pm (UTC)I am selfishly glad that you read lots of nonfiction, for the record, since it does such good for my nonfiction list. *laughing* I do consider manga/anime a separate genre as well, although I'm not sure why - well, I mean, I count it as separate on my booklist. But possibly that's just because there is not a lot of nonfiction manga/anime, as fa ras I am aware . . .
no subject
Date: 2010-09-23 04:26 pm (UTC)Sadly I do not think historical guest stars in fiction works count, EVEN THOUGH they are inevitably lolarious. And always make me want to at least Wikipedia that person.
no subject
Date: 2010-09-23 04:28 pm (UTC). . . which is not to say that you should read less fun books for three-year-olds, mind, because those are awesome too.
no subject
Date: 2010-09-23 04:29 pm (UTC)To be fair, I don't actually pick up a lot of fiction books on impulse either, these days. But mostly that's because my backlog of recommended-things and interestingly-reviewed-things and rereads-I-want-to-get-around-to and series-I-have-been-meaning-to-read-forever is SO LONG that I just do not have time!
no subject
Date: 2010-09-23 04:32 pm (UTC)A lot of SFF short stories do tend to be more physics/metaphysics geekiness, I think. Which is also interesting, if less specific to my own tastes! You get a lot of concept stories, in SF especially.
no subject
Date: 2010-09-23 04:39 pm (UTC)Thanks! I could always borrow them from faraway libraries, or even buy some now that I'm only a bit underemployed instead of terribly underemployed. But that would require knowing in advance what I want, and I don't. (It doesn't help that fantasy covers are so godawful.)
. . . which is not to say that you should read less fun books for three-year-olds, mind, because those are awesome too.
Stina Wirsén and Pija Lindenbaum are my goddesses. (The latter is even available in English!)
no subject
Date: 2010-09-23 04:48 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-09-23 04:58 pm (UTC)*makes notes!*