(no subject)
Mar. 31st, 2011 10:36 amFledgling, Octavia Butler's last novel, is sort of . . . . well. Okay. The experience of reading Fledgling is a bit like this:
OCTAVIA BUTLER: So I hear that the kids these days think that vampires are pretty hot. You know, sexy blood-drinking, being in sexy vampire thrall, just plain old vampire sex, that kind of thing.
BECCA: That is true of some kids these days I guess, it is not so much my bag but to each their own.
OCTAVIA BUTLER: WELL, I bet it is suddenly less sexy when the vampire in question is an amnesiac juvenile who looks like an eleven-year-old girl!
BECCA: Octavia Butler I am not sure I like where you are going with -
OCTAVIA BUTLER: Who literally makes the people she feeds on addicted to her vampire venom so that they'll die if they're separated from her, and exerts vague mind-control powers over them, which makes all the sex she has with them highly dubcon as well as awkwardly pedophiliac, even though she doesn't realize that she's dubconned them until after it happens! AREN'T YOU UNCOMFORTABLE NOW.
BECCA: YES, IN FACT. I am VERY uncomfortable now!
OCTAVIA BUTLER: LOLOLOLOLOL okay now that we've gotten rid of all the people who heard this was a vampire novel and are here for the sexy vampire times, we can start talking about the things I am actually interested in talking about, which are the ethical questions raised when one intelligent being is required by its nature to impose symbiosis on another intelligent being, and the kind of communities that that necessary symbiosis creates, and the ways that people adapt to becoming posthuman sort of without their consent, and the ways that people react to posthumans (or post-vampires as the case may be) and also racism.
BECCA: Yes, these are all really interesting things to talk about, and your interest in these topics is a large part of the reason why I read your books! And once you get past the squick this book is actually much less bleak than most of your other explorations of these topics, and it's nice that for once in a Butler book the whole of the human race is not doomed, but -
OCTAVIA BUTLER: Oh right, I guess I also needed a plot for the second half of the book while I'm busy showing Shori the vampire and her symbionts adapting to vampire society? VAMPIRE LEGAL THRILLER, GO.
BECCA: . . . okay? I'm pretty sure the plot is besides the point. Anyway, I do find the vampire (or Ina) society that you have set up really interesting, but . . . Octavia Butler, I know you want your books to be sort of uncomfortable to read, but seriously was it really necessary to squick us all out THAT MUCH?
OCTAVIA BUTLER: Yep! :D
BECCA: I AM NOT SURE I AGREE.
So, um, yes. Fledgling! As with all Butler books it was an interesting read, if uncomfortable in SLIGHTLY DIFFERENT ways than most of her others. But in a lot of ways, also similar to her others too. Vampire protagonist Shori's voice is a lot like Lauren Olamina's in Parable of the Sower; the dubcon-symbiosis of the vampire communities reminded me in different places of Dawn and Mind of My Mind and Clay's Ark. I think it's worth it if you've read a lot of Butler already to see what she's doing differently here (and can deal with the fact that she starts out the book trying her hardest to make you REALLY UNCOMFORTABLE), but I would definitely not tell new readers of Butler to start with this one.
Semi-relatedly: while I was looking for reviews on the internet, I totally found Fledgling listed on a "If You Like Twilight, Try . . . !" page, along with L.J. Smith and the Sookie Stackhouse books. Which I think is the FUNNIEST THING I HAVE SEEN ALL WEEK.
OCTAVIA BUTLER: So I hear that the kids these days think that vampires are pretty hot. You know, sexy blood-drinking, being in sexy vampire thrall, just plain old vampire sex, that kind of thing.
BECCA: That is true of some kids these days I guess, it is not so much my bag but to each their own.
OCTAVIA BUTLER: WELL, I bet it is suddenly less sexy when the vampire in question is an amnesiac juvenile who looks like an eleven-year-old girl!
BECCA: Octavia Butler I am not sure I like where you are going with -
OCTAVIA BUTLER: Who literally makes the people she feeds on addicted to her vampire venom so that they'll die if they're separated from her, and exerts vague mind-control powers over them, which makes all the sex she has with them highly dubcon as well as awkwardly pedophiliac, even though she doesn't realize that she's dubconned them until after it happens! AREN'T YOU UNCOMFORTABLE NOW.
BECCA: YES, IN FACT. I am VERY uncomfortable now!
OCTAVIA BUTLER: LOLOLOLOLOL okay now that we've gotten rid of all the people who heard this was a vampire novel and are here for the sexy vampire times, we can start talking about the things I am actually interested in talking about, which are the ethical questions raised when one intelligent being is required by its nature to impose symbiosis on another intelligent being, and the kind of communities that that necessary symbiosis creates, and the ways that people adapt to becoming posthuman sort of without their consent, and the ways that people react to posthumans (or post-vampires as the case may be) and also racism.
BECCA: Yes, these are all really interesting things to talk about, and your interest in these topics is a large part of the reason why I read your books! And once you get past the squick this book is actually much less bleak than most of your other explorations of these topics, and it's nice that for once in a Butler book the whole of the human race is not doomed, but -
OCTAVIA BUTLER: Oh right, I guess I also needed a plot for the second half of the book while I'm busy showing Shori the vampire and her symbionts adapting to vampire society? VAMPIRE LEGAL THRILLER, GO.
BECCA: . . . okay? I'm pretty sure the plot is besides the point. Anyway, I do find the vampire (or Ina) society that you have set up really interesting, but . . . Octavia Butler, I know you want your books to be sort of uncomfortable to read, but seriously was it really necessary to squick us all out THAT MUCH?
OCTAVIA BUTLER: Yep! :D
BECCA: I AM NOT SURE I AGREE.
So, um, yes. Fledgling! As with all Butler books it was an interesting read, if uncomfortable in SLIGHTLY DIFFERENT ways than most of her others. But in a lot of ways, also similar to her others too. Vampire protagonist Shori's voice is a lot like Lauren Olamina's in Parable of the Sower; the dubcon-symbiosis of the vampire communities reminded me in different places of Dawn and Mind of My Mind and Clay's Ark. I think it's worth it if you've read a lot of Butler already to see what she's doing differently here (and can deal with the fact that she starts out the book trying her hardest to make you REALLY UNCOMFORTABLE), but I would definitely not tell new readers of Butler to start with this one.
Semi-relatedly: while I was looking for reviews on the internet, I totally found Fledgling listed on a "If You Like Twilight, Try . . . !" page, along with L.J. Smith and the Sookie Stackhouse books. Which I think is the FUNNIEST THING I HAVE SEEN ALL WEEK.
no subject
Date: 2011-03-31 02:51 pm (UTC)I was all like, "WHAT?!!?! WHEN?!?!?!"
And the email was all like, "In half an hour!"
So I raced down there, and she talked about how she'd had writing block for seven years while she was trying to finish her parable series! And that she had finally (like, just 2-3 years ago) managed to get out of it by writing a fluffy little vampire novel that had just come out. I was made very happy by that.
And then she died.
no subject
Date: 2011-03-31 02:58 pm (UTC)I do, however, love that this was Octavia Butler's version of 'fluffy'.
no subject
Date: 2011-03-31 03:01 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-03-31 03:07 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-03-31 03:52 pm (UTC)I will totally fix this sometime soon!... >.>
no subject
Date: 2011-03-31 03:55 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-04-01 12:24 am (UTC)Becca, you are my favorite. *giggling*
no subject
Date: 2011-04-01 03:16 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-03-31 04:09 pm (UTC)She's such an amazing writer, though. And I am so damn sick of all the 'new twists' on vampirism when the actual implications are NEVER EXPLORED or are just asked and then never get brought up again. So hallelujah to her for doing that! *adds to list*
no subject
Date: 2011-03-31 04:12 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-03-31 04:16 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-03-31 04:15 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-03-31 04:30 pm (UTC)What would you recommend new readers of Butler to start with?
no subject
Date: 2011-03-31 04:35 pm (UTC)On the other hand if you just want a really good book that will tear you apart but is not all that much like her other stuff, I would say to read Kindred.
no subject
Date: 2011-03-31 04:42 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-03-31 04:44 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-04-01 04:42 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-04-01 03:24 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-03-31 04:44 pm (UTC)Also
I would definitely not tell new readers of Butler to start with this one.
Not even me? :D
no subject
Date: 2011-03-31 04:48 pm (UTC). . . . I dunno, man! On the one hand, okay, yes, IT IS RELEVANT TO YOUR INTERESTS. *laughing* On the other hand I still kind of think it's better to start with the one with the tentacle aliens!
no subject
Date: 2011-03-31 05:52 pm (UTC)Although I might be affected with how the books that have made a most lasting impression on me lately have been the ones that made me go "This SUCKS."
no subject
Date: 2011-03-31 06:02 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-03-31 06:24 pm (UTC)Maybe I should do long-distance loans again.
no subject
Date: 2011-03-31 06:32 pm (UTC)ALL OF WHICH is a long way of saying, I think owning Butler is worth it! But again, this isn't the first one I would buy. If you're only going to buy one, make it Kindred.
no subject
Date: 2011-03-31 06:40 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-03-31 06:47 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-03-31 08:13 pm (UTC)It is not a desolate book without hope, like @bookelfe said. But it deals with extremely difficult issues and racial history and it basically forces you to examine privilege, all and any of it (especially if you yourself are white).
It is emotionally gripping and exhausting but also has a very cathartic feel to it. Like, I do not regret reading it at all; I think it is one of the best books I have ever read in my life. But... it is not a book that you re-read. Sort of a ONCE AND IT WAS AMAZING AND NOW I PUT IT ON MY SHELF AND OCCASIONALLY REFLECT ON IT SOBERLY.
no subject
Date: 2011-03-31 08:34 pm (UTC)The whole privilege thing is... I tend of have to make myself examine it when it's framed in US terms, if that makes any sense? I mean, the specifics are so wildly different that it basically takes a lot of translation: "Okay, so if instead of group X I think group Y, and instead of historical factor A it's historical factor Z... whoah, that says some really nasty things about me." There's been some local stuff that hits home right away, but with the anglo stuff I pretty much have to will it to do so. I'm now curious to find out if this is any different!
Anyway, long-distance loan seems like a good start. I just have to finish the dozen library books I've got, first.
no subject
Date: 2011-03-31 08:56 pm (UTC)It's also just extremely well-written and amazingly researched and etc etc.
no subject
Date: 2011-03-31 06:17 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-03-31 06:25 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-03-31 07:01 pm (UTC)OCTAVIA BUTLER: Yep! :D
BECCA: I AM NOT SURE I AGREE.
I saw Butler speak at my college about a year before she died, and asked her, basically, "so, I see you've written elsewhere that other people found Doro creepy, but in your head you got used to him, and even kind of fond of him. Didn't that squick you out a little, that somebody you thought up was obviously so evil, even to you, and to your readers, but as a writer you didn't care?" She was basically like, "well, he's an evil guy, but I'd had that character so long in my head that he wasn't just evil to me--it was just the way he was, you know? And I'm not him, and he's not me."
As a writer, I really respected that, and had asked the question because as a writer I was having a hard time dealing with being comfortable with my own rather, well, less-than-savory characters and their depravities. And in the end, writers are gonna write for themselves, mostly, and consider it a privilege when anyone else wants to read their work.
But as a reader, I realized I would have preferred a different answer. It took me years to figure that out.
no subject
Date: 2011-03-31 07:21 pm (UTC)Which is not necessarily the way one wants to think about the evil in the world; one wants to think that the moral judgments one makes can matter. Though it is, yeah, a very good answer for a writer, when you know a story has to be the way it is, and there's not much you can do about it.
no subject
Date: 2011-03-31 08:31 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-03-31 08:42 pm (UTC)OCTAVIA BUTLER: But I bet you weren't expecting the tentacle porn.
READER: Even if I was expecting the tentacle porn this is NOT THE TENTACLE PORN I WAS EXPECTING.
OCTAVIA BUTLER: So I hear you like psychic kids? I would like you to meet Mary.
READER: D: D: D: D: D: D: D:
OCTAVIA BUTLER: Have fun!
READER: Hey, post-apocalyptic rebuilding of society with an actual hopeful ending! Awesome!
OCTAVIA BUTLER: >:D
READER: . . . what do you mean the sequel starts with EVERYONE IN A PRISON CAMP?
READER: Oh look a time travel novel! This'll be - okay okay I am building the blanket fort in advance this time.
no subject
Date: 2011-03-31 10:17 pm (UTC)Also, for vampire novels, you should totally read Elizabeth Kostova's The Historian which is more or less about fighting Dracula with the powers of research and contains evil vampire librarians.
no subject
Date: 2011-04-01 03:15 am (UTC)I have heard of this! I do like the power of research. :D
no subject
Date: 2011-04-01 03:28 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-04-01 03:46 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-04-01 03:59 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-04-01 04:00 am (UTC)FROM WHAT I HAVE HEARD YOU WOULD KNOW IF YOU'D READ THE MPREG ONE
no subject
Date: 2011-04-01 04:20 am (UTC)Any tips on where to find this story (or what it's called)? XD
no subject
Date: 2011-04-01 04:25 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-04-04 11:28 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-04-05 01:57 am (UTC)