(no subject)
Jul. 16th, 2012 10:23 amI have to admit I was a little bit nervous, after my reaction to Men at Arms, about rereading Feet of Clay. Because Feet of Clay has always been one of my favorites, and what if I didn't love it?
Fortunately it turns out that I still feel totally okay loving Feet of Clay. Because DORFL and CHERI. I mean, other things too, but: DORFL and CHERI.
So let's talk first about Dorfl!
So the golem theme in this book is about freedom and humanity and is basically Discworld's chance to do the extremely beloved sci-fi theme of 'sentient robots! are they human? should they have rights? does using them . . . make us assholes . . .? WHAT ABOUT IF THEY ARE EVIL KILLER ROBOTS DO THEY STILL HAVE RIGHTS THEN?'
And I generally like the stories that go 'pretty much yes' to all these questions, and Discworld does not fail me here. Feet of Clay is I think really the book that drives home how important it is, and how important it is to Vimes, that people are thought of as people. It's not just a class thing anymore. It's a freedom thing. And that works, in the way that the race thing did not in Men At Arms.
But while we're talking about things: so the gender thing!
Now you could read the Cheri thing in a couple of different ways, I think. And some of them are more problematic than others! But the part I like to focus on is this: Cheri comes from a society that tells her that she needs to present as a certain gender. She wants to present as a different gender. And she gets harassed for it, even by sympathetic people who are having their norms challenged, and she persists, within her comfort zone, and does it anyway, and that's awesome.
And at the same time she's expressing prejudice against werewolves, and Angua is prejudiced as hell against golems, and that's a good thing to point out, too, that there are different axes and everything is complicated, and being oppressed in one area doesn't mean taking it out in a different direction is okay. I like that, too.
And hey: first Watch book to pass the Bechdel Test! BONUS.
But I am also really curious to see how other people read this stuff! Tell me your thoughts!
In other news: I think this is the last book where Carrot does not outright terrify me? I mean he's even starting to terrify me here, but I can still be like, 'aw, Carrot, you're sweet.' BUT THIS MAY WELL BE THE LAST TIME.
In other other news: still not enough Sybil.
Fortunately it turns out that I still feel totally okay loving Feet of Clay. Because DORFL and CHERI. I mean, other things too, but: DORFL and CHERI.
So let's talk first about Dorfl!
So the golem theme in this book is about freedom and humanity and is basically Discworld's chance to do the extremely beloved sci-fi theme of 'sentient robots! are they human? should they have rights? does using them . . . make us assholes . . .? WHAT ABOUT IF THEY ARE EVIL KILLER ROBOTS DO THEY STILL HAVE RIGHTS THEN?'
And I generally like the stories that go 'pretty much yes' to all these questions, and Discworld does not fail me here. Feet of Clay is I think really the book that drives home how important it is, and how important it is to Vimes, that people are thought of as people. It's not just a class thing anymore. It's a freedom thing. And that works, in the way that the race thing did not in Men At Arms.
But while we're talking about things: so the gender thing!
Now you could read the Cheri thing in a couple of different ways, I think. And some of them are more problematic than others! But the part I like to focus on is this: Cheri comes from a society that tells her that she needs to present as a certain gender. She wants to present as a different gender. And she gets harassed for it, even by sympathetic people who are having their norms challenged, and she persists, within her comfort zone, and does it anyway, and that's awesome.
And at the same time she's expressing prejudice against werewolves, and Angua is prejudiced as hell against golems, and that's a good thing to point out, too, that there are different axes and everything is complicated, and being oppressed in one area doesn't mean taking it out in a different direction is okay. I like that, too.
And hey: first Watch book to pass the Bechdel Test! BONUS.
But I am also really curious to see how other people read this stuff! Tell me your thoughts!
In other news: I think this is the last book where Carrot does not outright terrify me? I mean he's even starting to terrify me here, but I can still be like, 'aw, Carrot, you're sweet.' BUT THIS MAY WELL BE THE LAST TIME.
In other other news: still not enough Sybil.
no subject
Date: 2012-07-16 03:12 pm (UTC)There's never enough Sybil. Is there? I can't remember - is there a book where there's enough Sybil?
Carrot doesn't terrify me, even when he's being all cunning (possibly because I can't stop thinking of him as alternate!Fraser), but I can see why he could be seen as terrifying.
no subject
Date: 2012-07-16 03:20 pm (UTC)Carrot starts to really scare me once you realize that he can perfectly manipulate everyone around him, to a T, and nobody will ever know he's doing it except Angua and even she's not a hundred percent sure. And the only brake on him is his own very specific sense of justice. That's a terrifying man!
no subject
Date: 2012-07-17 02:10 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-07-17 03:07 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-07-16 05:11 pm (UTC)Also after reading your comment below on Carrot, I agree, he is terrifying. I think it first becomes apparent in Fifth Elephant and then is really obvious in Jingo. In Jingo, Vimes does seem to see some of how he works, but not in the same way that Angua does. I'm not quite sure why she sees through him when no one else does.
Yes, more Sybil, she's wonderful in Fifth Elephant, which is one of my favorites. I love all the Watch books, but I love some more than others. Also I really need to find a copy of Snuff, I hope the library in Delaware has it so I can read it.
no subject
Date: 2012-07-16 05:57 pm (UTC)But Cheri and Angua and the golems are way more important than even the actual policing and I love them all.
It makes sense to me that Angua sees through Carrot more than anyone else -- it would be even creepier to me if she didn't, because she is dating him, and spending the most time with him of anyone, and power dynamics! I would like to think that if my boyfriend was cheerfully manipulating an entire city I would be picking up on it at least a little. I HOPE.
no subject
Date: 2012-07-16 06:02 pm (UTC)Outsiders will pick up on Carrot, Achmed, the clove eating Vimes counterpart in Jingo notices it and Vetinari is clearly aware. Also the wolves in Fifth Elephant do as well, though there what Carrot is doing is made a touch more apparent. I think Vetinari sees Carrot as a parallel and acknowledges that but they have clearly defined ideas of what they will do and not do. There's a lot of using of each other going on with them as they both merrily manipulate Vimes.
Oh, I just had a wonderful plot bunny that I don't know if I could manage to write. Characters with complex issues of gender and presentation along with so competent. Imagine Cheri and Taura from the Vorkosignan books working together.
no subject
Date: 2012-07-16 06:58 pm (UTC)I'd forgotten about the counterpart in Jingo, but . . . I've forgotten a lot of Jingo. It's coming up on my reread soon, though!
Cheri and Taura working together would be GREAT. Although, hah, so would Taura and Angua, really. Wolfgirls unite!
no subject
Date: 2012-07-16 09:19 pm (UTC)Jingo is an odd one. It has some of my favorite moments with Leonard of Quirm and Noddy trying to outsmart each other, but also Vimes overthinking. Its one of the more political ones and connects very much to Thud, the tropes it picks up on are a lot of British ideas of war. At least the ideas from before World War I, I enjoy it, but I know it has problems.
Yes, need all the crossovers of competent ladies kicking ass.
no subject
Date: 2012-07-17 01:18 am (UTC)I'm not convinced of this, but it could happen. I've always seen Carrot and Vetinari as ... I was going to say "opposite" but it isn't even opposite, is the thing. As two points on the idealism-pragmatism scale. Vetinari is so pragmatic that he hits idealism from the other side, and Carrot is so idealistic that he hits pragmatism from the other side, and it is amazing.
Also: CHERI, HOW SO AWESOME. *hugs her*
no subject
Date: 2012-07-17 03:03 am (UTC)And also there's the possibility that gets mentioned that a king couldn't get away with having a werewolf for a queen, and Carrot won't have that.
Carrot, in my eyes, is basically Clark Kent, and Vimes is his Bruce - the jaded bastard who will keep the Man of Steel from abusing his power.
- LOOK AT ALL MY CARROT FEELS. Apparently I have them.
no subject
Date: 2012-07-17 03:32 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-07-17 02:19 pm (UTC)It's an analogy!
no subject
Date: 2012-07-17 03:30 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-07-17 04:07 am (UTC)I... do not remember Feet of Clay well enough to comment on it! But YAY CHERI regardless.
no subject
Date: 2012-07-17 07:11 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-07-17 12:18 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-07-17 02:11 pm (UTC)(I vote Moist.)
no subject
Date: 2012-07-18 04:31 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-07-17 09:56 pm (UTC)♥
no subject
Date: 2012-07-18 04:32 pm (UTC)