(no subject)
Jan. 24th, 2014 09:10 amSo one of the panels I attended at Arisia was a panel on kings and class and aristocracy in fantasy. It was probably one of my favorite panels overall, and the panelists all had extremely interesting things to say, but one thing that I was hoping for that didn't really happen was any kind of discussion of the fantasy that does buck the trend and go full-on republican.
...well, okay, a lot of people brought up Terry Pratchett, but the fact that no one could think of anything besides Discworld is PRETTY TELLING, I think. And while Ankh-Morpork isn't monarchist, it's hella dictatorial, so we're setting Discworld aside for now, officially, as of this sentence.
Anyway, later that day
genarti and
sandrylene and I sat down and started making a list, and this is what we came up with:
- Lloyd Alexander's Westmark books
- Frances Hardinge's Fly By Night/Fly Trap and Gullstruck Island
- China Mieville's Bas Lag books
- Hiromu Arakawa's Fullmetal Alchemist
- N.K. Jemisin's The Killing Moon, but then SPOILER ALERT they get the monarchy back at the end of the sequel, so ....
- Diana Wynne Jones' Dalemark books ... sort of ....? This is really a stretch, because for all its proletarian impulses and critique of aristocracy, The Crown of Dalemark does conclude pretty emphatically with "HERE IS THE NEW DIVINELY ORDAINED MONARCH." My only justification is that if I remember correctly Dalemark does become a constitutional republic by Maewen's time, but I might just be making that up.
- Fuyumi Ono's Twelve Kingdoms also, sort of, which is even MORE of a stretch because the entire SERIES is about divinely ordained kings, it's just that it's also a really well done critique of the system ... but it's not like they can get rid of the divinely ordained kings ... yeah, as much as I love it Twelve Kingdoms shouldn't really be on here. This is how desperate we were.
There is also a subset of republican/revolutionary fantasy, which is the books where instead of revolting against kings everyone just straight up revolts against the gods:
- Philip Pullman's Golden Compass
- Anne Ursu's Cronus Chronicles, which ruined me a little for the Rick Riordan books by setting up a world in which Greek gods were real and had authority over humanity and then taking it to its logical conclusion of "AND THAT WOULD BE THE ACTUAL WORST, LET'S FIX THAT"
- Terry Pratchett and Neil Gaiman's Good Omens, kind of
And ... that's it? That's all we could think of. But that can't possibly be it it. Help! What are some other republican/revolutionary fantasies?
("What about stuff like the Hunger Games?" said Gen. "YA dystopia doesn't count," I said, "because it's not fantasy, it's sci-fi, and it's working off a different set of tropes." And then we argued about that for a bit, but the end result is I'm ruling out stuff like the Hunger Games. Revolution against an oppressive regime is absolutely a staple of the YA dystopia paradigm, but I think that's a different conversation.
We are also none of us all that well versed in urban fantasy, but someone on the panel pointed out, quite rightly, that like 60% of urban fantasy involves some kind of fairy court that is totally aristocratic/monarchical, and I'm pretty sure that the other 40% involves some kind of strictly hierarchical werewolf or vampire social structure with an alpha werewolf/vampire king/etc. That said, if anyone has an example of a book in which someone LEADS THE REVOLUTION against the monarchical urban fantasy fairies/hierarchical werewolves, please do feel free to throw it into the pot!)
I am also one hundred percent sure I am not the first person to discuss this topic on the Internet, so if anybody has links to other posts/lists along these lines, that would also be great.
...well, okay, a lot of people brought up Terry Pratchett, but the fact that no one could think of anything besides Discworld is PRETTY TELLING, I think. And while Ankh-Morpork isn't monarchist, it's hella dictatorial, so we're setting Discworld aside for now, officially, as of this sentence.
Anyway, later that day
- Lloyd Alexander's Westmark books
- Frances Hardinge's Fly By Night/Fly Trap and Gullstruck Island
- China Mieville's Bas Lag books
- Hiromu Arakawa's Fullmetal Alchemist
- N.K. Jemisin's The Killing Moon, but then SPOILER ALERT they get the monarchy back at the end of the sequel, so ....
- Diana Wynne Jones' Dalemark books ... sort of ....? This is really a stretch, because for all its proletarian impulses and critique of aristocracy, The Crown of Dalemark does conclude pretty emphatically with "HERE IS THE NEW DIVINELY ORDAINED MONARCH." My only justification is that if I remember correctly Dalemark does become a constitutional republic by Maewen's time, but I might just be making that up.
- Fuyumi Ono's Twelve Kingdoms also, sort of, which is even MORE of a stretch because the entire SERIES is about divinely ordained kings, it's just that it's also a really well done critique of the system ... but it's not like they can get rid of the divinely ordained kings ... yeah, as much as I love it Twelve Kingdoms shouldn't really be on here. This is how desperate we were.
There is also a subset of republican/revolutionary fantasy, which is the books where instead of revolting against kings everyone just straight up revolts against the gods:
- Philip Pullman's Golden Compass
- Anne Ursu's Cronus Chronicles, which ruined me a little for the Rick Riordan books by setting up a world in which Greek gods were real and had authority over humanity and then taking it to its logical conclusion of "AND THAT WOULD BE THE ACTUAL WORST, LET'S FIX THAT"
- Terry Pratchett and Neil Gaiman's Good Omens, kind of
And ... that's it? That's all we could think of. But that can't possibly be it it. Help! What are some other republican/revolutionary fantasies?
("What about stuff like the Hunger Games?" said Gen. "YA dystopia doesn't count," I said, "because it's not fantasy, it's sci-fi, and it's working off a different set of tropes." And then we argued about that for a bit, but the end result is I'm ruling out stuff like the Hunger Games. Revolution against an oppressive regime is absolutely a staple of the YA dystopia paradigm, but I think that's a different conversation.
We are also none of us all that well versed in urban fantasy, but someone on the panel pointed out, quite rightly, that like 60% of urban fantasy involves some kind of fairy court that is totally aristocratic/monarchical, and I'm pretty sure that the other 40% involves some kind of strictly hierarchical werewolf or vampire social structure with an alpha werewolf/vampire king/etc. That said, if anyone has an example of a book in which someone LEADS THE REVOLUTION against the monarchical urban fantasy fairies/hierarchical werewolves, please do feel free to throw it into the pot!)
I am also one hundred percent sure I am not the first person to discuss this topic on the Internet, so if anybody has links to other posts/lists along these lines, that would also be great.
no subject
Date: 2014-01-24 03:18 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2014-01-24 07:42 pm (UTC)(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2014-01-24 03:47 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2014-01-24 07:45 pm (UTC)(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2014-01-24 03:53 pm (UTC)Kate Griffin's Matthew Swift urban fantasy series had the Midnight Mayor, who is typically chosen by their equivalent of corporate succession, so it's arguably a corporate/republican system (though the in-series version is an outlier to this for various reasons) There are no revolutions.
The Borribles trilogy by Michael de Larrabeiti is arguably ANARCHIST urban fantasy (the Borribles operate on a gang system, and are basically rebelling against Everything Ever)
Sadly I am completely failing to think of any non-urban fantasy examples that might remotely fit. Wow, this is amazing. As I recall, at least some of the MANY powers causing chaos in Phillip Reeve's Mortal Cities quartet had to be run on a non-monarchist system...? /clutching at straws here That's basically post-apocalyptic dystopia though.
no subject
Date: 2014-01-24 07:52 pm (UTC)...unless there is a KINGPIN, wacka-wacka ba-dum bing.
I don't thiiiink there were any kings in the Mortal Engines, actually, you're right! Weren't the cities run by councils or something and then, like, a set of revolutionary bio-anarchists? I keep wanting to call them the Green Party but I don't think that's actually accurate. You are also correct that Mortal Engines is also more steampunkish sff than fantasy though ....
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2014-01-24 04:00 pm (UTC)(but all of a sudden I really really want to read about the french revolution in Temeraire-verse!)
no subject
Date: 2014-01-24 07:53 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2014-01-24 04:07 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2014-01-24 07:54 pm (UTC)I never read Artemis Fowl, but the fact that the fairies have a representative government is actually pretty cool.
no subject
Date: 2014-01-24 04:07 pm (UTC)The Kitty Norville books show how the conventional werewolf pack structure can be abusive, but four books in just replaces the leadership of that pack.
I can't remember what happens to the Arameri rule in _The Kingdom of Gods_. I should really get on re-reading that.
no subject
Date: 2014-01-24 07:43 pm (UTC)(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2014-01-24 04:16 pm (UTC)Either way, the state of the government isn't the driving plot point, though I do imagine a couple of those installed democracies fall to bits post-canon, and the others take a turn toward the kind of mudslinging we see every year.
no subject
Date: 2014-01-24 07:59 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2014-01-24 04:18 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2014-01-24 08:03 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2014-01-24 04:19 pm (UTC)I think this is partly why I read more SF than I do fantasy these days--it's more politically interesting. Dammit, there should be more revolutions in fantasy.
Oh, wait! I got one! Elizabeth Moon's The Legacy of Gird is all about a farmers' revolt against the aristocracy. Pity her latest books in the same world are all about the rightfully ordained king, yadda yadda.
no subject
Date: 2014-01-24 08:04 pm (UTC)...aheh, yeah, I'm not sure it counts if the eventual endpoint is "but then, the king!"
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2014-01-24 04:35 pm (UTC)(ETA: And because I'm LITERALLY USING AN ICON FROM IT, but A:TLA/LoK does eventually get a Republic.)
I'd agree on THG though, not because it's YA but yeah because it's sci-fi, and sci-fi does have a whole genre history of non-monarchical dictatorships. But I was also talking about it last night with regard to The Giver and how what I'm seeing out of that movie adaptation is basically THG knock-off (and I'm SO MAD).
no subject
Date: 2014-01-24 08:06 pm (UTC)I was thinking about YA lit and suburban fantasy above where someone was talking about Young Wizards. It's true that the whole "there is a secret world of magical people alongside the real world!" does tend to avoid monarchies for the most part.
(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2014-01-24 04:47 pm (UTC)Disqualifiers:
- marketed as historical fiction, not fantasy
- there IS a monarchy because it's set in England
- the protagonist's connection to the land is the most magical element and it's all about hereditary land ownership -- although if I remember correctly this does get challenged in some way, and possibly even completely dismantled by the end of the trilogy (it's been a while since I read them)
Qualifiers:
- there is magic
- the first book is set in the 18th century and is all about enclosure and potential farmers' revolts (n.b. I don't remember how well Gregory wrote about this -- I read these ages before I learned about enclosure anywhere else), and not in such a way that happy ending = end of revolts, restoration of status quo
no subject
Date: 2014-01-24 08:07 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2014-01-24 05:33 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2014-01-24 08:08 pm (UTC)Also, another interesting thing: at least 3/4 of the examples that people have brought up of specifically republican second-world fantasy are YA. Teens love democracy?
no subject
Date: 2014-01-24 05:39 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2014-01-24 08:09 pm (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2014-01-24 06:00 pm (UTC)2. While The Dresden Files has the usual fairy courts and a fairly undemocratic white council of wizards who get the job due to seniority, at least that council is open to people besides white men and it seems to have some degree of meritocracy. In addition, some wizards have formed a secret grey council that might very well overthrow the white council since the white council is problematic. By and large, though, Harry Dresden just snarks about the white council.
3. Mike Carey's Felix Castor novels have absolutely no ruling bodies at all. Felix deals with the usual authority figures like the cops, big business, big science, etc. But the books are happily devoid of any fairy courts or secret orders of monster hunters.
no subject
Date: 2014-01-24 08:10 pm (UTC)Yeah, I think what we are seeing is that it's a lot easier for urban fantasy just to assume everything takes place under the aegis of Your Friendly Local Government and not really concern itself with the question.
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2014-01-24 07:05 pm (UTC)Book One is primarily concerned with the planning and execution of a rebellion against the Lord Ruler, who's ruled for a thousand years because he's the Sliver of Infinity, a piece of god. (This is true, but not in the way he or his church implies.) Book Three involves attempts to destroy the god of destruction (not, worth noting, of evil; just destruction, or more precisely Ruin).
The political structure in Alloy of Law, the sequel, isn't explored much, beyond that there are lords and something along the lines of popularly-elected senators. (Specifically, someone won one with a platform that boiled down to "I can do copper magic, so I'm immune to magical emotion manipulation.")
Warbreaker also involves rebellion against a God-King, but it isn't done by the protagonists and isn't successful.
no subject
Date: 2014-01-24 08:11 pm (UTC)(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2014-01-24 07:59 pm (UTC)I feel like I've read a lot of werewolf/vampire urban fantasy and paranormal romance where America is much as it is now politically and the werewolves/vampires don't have kings or centralized government, but of course now I can't think of specific books. If there's any kings or queens in Marjorie Liu's books, I don't remember them at all. (I think one book has an evil mermaid queen, but she might just be a powerful witch.)
no subject
Date: 2014-01-24 08:12 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2014-01-24 08:51 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2014-01-25 05:03 am (UTC)(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2014-01-24 09:09 pm (UTC)Her vampires are decidedly not hierarchical, but only because they have terrifically violent territorial disputes if they're in the same area. There is a really interesting theme if kingship in her vampire books, though, because Henry I'd the bastard son (NOT "SUB," AUTO CORRECT) of Henry VIII, and he has semi-mystical princely charisma. Huff basically posits, add Pratchett does, that a lot of people are just inclined to bend at the knees to charismatic kingly types, but she also had multiple characters who reject our resent Henry using his "Prince of Men" voice at them. But ... That probably doesn't quite count.
no subject
Date: 2014-01-25 05:05 am (UTC)I don't know how I feel about mystical princely charisma!
no subject
Date: 2014-01-24 10:05 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2014-01-25 05:05 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2014-01-24 10:14 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2014-01-25 05:07 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2014-01-24 10:34 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2014-01-25 05:09 am (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2014-01-24 11:08 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2014-01-25 05:11 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2014-01-24 11:50 pm (UTC)There's a revolution in Amanda Downum's The Drowning City, but I don't think it goes all the way to the top, it's more a shifted balance of municipal power in a monarchical state. (She does write excellent politics, but there's usually hereditary rule at the back of it, even if it's realistically non-absolute.) In Hiromi Goto's The Water of Possibility, I believe the story ends with a more communal society being established, though one with family hierarchies, but it's also YA. and not very explicitly political. Candas Jane Dorsey's Black Wine contains both a variety of societies, some of which are democratic or socialist, and a revolution against monarchy, though it's not totally clear by the end of the book how successful they've been at fixing the social structure. Holly Lisle's Fire in the Mist has some cities that don't appear to have hereditary leaders, though she's vague about their political systems except for mentions of mayors and councils and that kind of thing.
If there's a trend here, I'd have to say it's cities being allowed to be more democratic than nations, which is probably another one of those tropes that comes from fantasy being assumed to be set in somewhere awfully like medieval Europe.
no subject
Date: 2014-01-25 05:12 am (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2014-01-25 12:06 am (UTC)I have never seen another set of books in which there is just this occasional nonviolent switch from monarchy to republic and back, though. Dragaerans are strange people.
One of the major plot points of Gemma Files' Hexslinger books is that an Aztec deity would like to establish a divine kingship over most of America, and many other people would rather found a magical representative democracy, which they in fact eventually do. It's not the same democracy as the U.S., which is present in the eastern chunk of the continent, because magic-users have issues which mean they need to do some things differently, but it is a democracy.
no subject
Date: 2014-01-25 05:15 am (UTC)I haven't read the Hexslinger books, but the first one is on my Kindle to be read at some point in the near future!
no subject
Date: 2014-01-25 12:54 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2014-01-25 05:16 am (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From: