(no subject)
Sep. 14th, 2016 08:26 pmIt is almost this month's book club, which reminds me that I never wrote up last month's book club book, Ursula LeGuin's The Lathe of Heaven.
The Lathe of Heaven is one of those deceptively short, simple LeGuins that takes a premise and just steadily and relentlessly works its way through it.
In this case, the premise is that when hapless little George Orr goes into REM sleep, his dreams accidentally change the world.
Nobody knows about or remembers any of the previous iterations of reality but George, and George is EXTREMELY STRESSED about all of this. So stressed that the mild dystopia in which he lives eventually mandates that he go to therapy -- where his therapist Dr. Haber becomes the second person to learn about George's abilities, and has the bright idea of combining hypnosis with sleep manipulation to create a perfect (for Dr. Haber) society!
Dr. Haber has probably not read The Monkey's Paw or any of the other various helpful fables about being careful what you wish for, but even if he had read them, he probably wouldn't think they applied to him anwyway.
What follows is an increasingly weird series of dystopias, as George fumbles through an effort to take some sort of responsibility for his unwanted powers by attempting to convince Dr. Haber that he should not be taking responsibility for the whole world, while, around them, any kind of definitive sense of 'reality' starts to fold inward on itself like the end of an Ikuhara series.
The book has three characters -- George, Dr. Haber, and Heather Lalache, George's lawyer and love interest, who in the first half of the book seems like she is going to be a force on the order of the first two and in the second half of the book functions almost entirely as a metaphorical symbol for Why A World In Which Race Does Not Exist Is A Dystopia. (Heather is mixed-race.) This is probably my biggest frustration with the book and the reason I do not wholeheartedly love it, but is also something that I do not think would have happened were this not one of LeGuin's first novels, and written in 1971.
There have been a couple of TV movies made of this book and I haven't seen any of them, but the more I think about it, the more I would love to see a really surreally animated version.
The Lathe of Heaven is one of those deceptively short, simple LeGuins that takes a premise and just steadily and relentlessly works its way through it.
In this case, the premise is that when hapless little George Orr goes into REM sleep, his dreams accidentally change the world.
Nobody knows about or remembers any of the previous iterations of reality but George, and George is EXTREMELY STRESSED about all of this. So stressed that the mild dystopia in which he lives eventually mandates that he go to therapy -- where his therapist Dr. Haber becomes the second person to learn about George's abilities, and has the bright idea of combining hypnosis with sleep manipulation to create a perfect (for Dr. Haber) society!
Dr. Haber has probably not read The Monkey's Paw or any of the other various helpful fables about being careful what you wish for, but even if he had read them, he probably wouldn't think they applied to him anwyway.
What follows is an increasingly weird series of dystopias, as George fumbles through an effort to take some sort of responsibility for his unwanted powers by attempting to convince Dr. Haber that he should not be taking responsibility for the whole world, while, around them, any kind of definitive sense of 'reality' starts to fold inward on itself like the end of an Ikuhara series.
The book has three characters -- George, Dr. Haber, and Heather Lalache, George's lawyer and love interest, who in the first half of the book seems like she is going to be a force on the order of the first two and in the second half of the book functions almost entirely as a metaphorical symbol for Why A World In Which Race Does Not Exist Is A Dystopia. (Heather is mixed-race.) This is probably my biggest frustration with the book and the reason I do not wholeheartedly love it, but is also something that I do not think would have happened were this not one of LeGuin's first novels, and written in 1971.
There have been a couple of TV movies made of this book and I haven't seen any of them, but the more I think about it, the more I would love to see a really surreally animated version.
no subject
Date: 2016-09-15 01:39 am (UTC)PS: LeGuin was actually involved in the production. That sort of thing never happens.
no subject
Date: 2016-09-15 01:51 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2016-09-15 02:57 am (UTC)I'm pretty sure I saw it on DVD, but it is also on YouTube.
That said, you should totally watch the copy in your archive; that's awesome.
no subject
Date: 2016-09-15 04:23 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2016-09-15 02:56 am (UTC)Seconding the 1980 PBS film. It is microbudget and I remember the climax being highly confusing to people who have not read the book (like the person I watched it with years ago), but I liked Davison's George and Margaret Avery's Heather a lot.
no subject
Date: 2016-09-15 04:24 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2016-09-15 02:09 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2016-09-15 02:38 am (UTC)...admittedly I also wonder what 1971!LeGuin would have made of Portland's reputation now.
no subject
Date: 2016-09-15 02:59 am (UTC)But yeah, there's a TON of recognizable stuff throughout. I'd have to see if I still have my notes... Oh, here's a c&p from an email where I went into some of this for a friend, who was staying in one of the Convention Center hotels in inner NE:
There's also a point in the novel where someone takes a streetcar up into the hills above Goose Hollow: that streetcar line existed once upon a time, the ruins are still there.
There's also a reference in the novel to "the old Lloyd Center, once the biggest shopping center in the world, back before the Crash." Lloyd Center, as I recall, was just being built then. I don't think of it as being particularly large, even by 1970s standards, but I'd have to dig through the newspaper archives to see what was being said about it at time.
But yeah, just a ton of stuff like that, all throughout the book.
And no, I haven't the slightest idea what 1971!Le Guin would have to say about Portland's current rep; I don't even know if she has a public opinion about it now.
no subject
Date: 2016-09-16 04:22 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2016-09-16 05:08 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2016-09-15 04:25 pm (UTC)OH, THAT WOULD BE AWESOME
Did you ever read the photobook Le Guin wrote captions for called Blue Moon over Thurman Street?
no subject
Date: 2016-09-15 02:51 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2016-09-16 04:23 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2016-09-15 02:59 am (UTC)Oh, man, if Satoshi Kon weren't dead.
no subject
Date: 2016-09-15 03:29 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2016-09-16 04:24 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2016-09-16 04:24 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2016-09-15 03:46 am (UTC)I would 100% watch a trippy animated version, though I did like the PBS version I watched on Youtube! But - animated. Oh man, that would be lovely.
no subject
Date: 2016-09-15 04:27 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2016-09-15 05:25 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2016-09-16 05:07 am (UTC)And you probably already know this, but I am pretty sure George's name is a tribute to Orwell and 1984, which also has the benevolent/twisted Wise Man and rebellious love interest and repressive society, &c &c. Orr's shifting realities even mirror the Eastasia/Eurasia thing, a bit.
no subject
Date: 2016-09-16 04:25 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2016-09-15 05:26 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2016-09-16 04:26 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2016-09-16 07:01 am (UTC)IIRC, they switched the "Mixed race" lawyer to fit the actresses' ethnicity, which worked fine. They may also have had everyone be -green- during the race-blind bit near the end as well, rather than grey.
no subject
Date: 2016-09-15 12:21 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2016-09-16 04:26 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2016-09-15 04:33 pm (UTC)I gradually realized that my own fiction was telling me that I could no longer ignore the feminine. While I was writing The Eye of the Heron in 1977, the hero insisted on destroying himself before the middle of the book. "Hey," I said, "you can't do that, you're the hero. Where's my book?" I stopped writing. The book had a woman in it, but I didn't know how to write about women. I blundered around a while and then found some guidance in feminist theory. I got excited when I discovered feminist literary criticism was something I could read and actually enjoy. I read The Norton Book of Literature by Women from cover to cover. It was a bible for me. It taught me that I didn't have to write like an honorary man anymore, that I could write like a woman and feel liberated in doing so.
So I think that affects Heather's characterization too. I never find a reason for why she returns at the end of the book, but it's always great to see her as herself again.
no subject
Date: 2016-09-15 05:27 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2016-09-16 04:30 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2016-09-16 05:00 am (UTC)The book works better for me if I see it as part of Le Guin's "marriage thesis" thing -- that it's not so much about three people, as a dyad and its antagonist. (Le Guin is careful not to have Haber emotionally intimate with anyone, and most of her villains use and alienate other people as a matter of course.) George/Heather are like Shevek/Takver in Dispossessed, with some of the same problems, the female characters start out as very vibrant and then fade out when the romance starts up. Same thing happened with Tenar/Ged -- not that there was romance, but after Tombs of Atuan I really thought we'd see her in the third book, and I think she gets one tiny mention. (And then of course there was Tehanu. Oh boy. But even in that, she and Ged are still like a dyad.)
I mean, I don't know if it works for other people, but I started looking at Le Guin's books after she said the thesis of her whole work was "Marriage" (in Language of the Night) and her books usually do have two protagonists, male/female, and she loves having a male "jellyfish" and a stronger female character. So they usually have an unconventional relationship to each other, but they're in the conventional relationship socially speaking? And I really see it in Lathe -- George comes to Heather asking for her help, she's the outwardly aggressive and even fierce partner, there's a lot of emphasis on his soft vulnerable flesh (that repeated visual of Haber laying his great hand on George's throat, yeek) v Heather's metallic armour and masks, and then she has that wonderful realization in the cabin (which is really maybe my fave part of the whole book) that "Here, short, bloodshot, psychotic, and in hiding, here he was, her tower of strength" -- he's not just taking from her, but giving something nobody else can. (And then she thinks right afterwards "Life is the most incredible mess," which is great.)
And then when the colour of her skin can't exist, she can't either, which is.... ....yeah. I mean the text flat out says she couldn't be born. And then she's brought back by the dreaming? The music? The Alien? And then she goes pouf, and George is the one who gets the big heroic gesture. (Which I also love, because it's "pressing one damned OFF button.") And then wait, she's back again. I mean, I love that she does come back because **HEATHER,** but it is sort of how Left Hand read as a book about a planet of dudes because the male narrator used the default male pronouns. It's a big step forward, but there's also something off about it.
/babble because I do love that book a whole lot, sorry
no subject
Date: 2016-09-16 05:47 am (UTC)How did you feel about The Other Wind? I have huge problems with the metaphysics, but I like cranky older Tenar and Ged.
no subject
Date: 2016-09-16 06:09 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2016-09-19 12:53 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2016-09-15 08:16 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2016-09-16 04:31 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2016-09-15 08:24 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2016-09-16 04:33 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2016-09-15 09:54 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2016-09-16 04:33 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2016-09-18 09:03 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2016-09-19 12:48 am (UTC)