(no subject)
Apr. 3rd, 2017 09:22 pmDennaleia (Denna), the Good Princess, is polite and ladylike and scholarly and eager to be of use to her kingdom of origin and also the kingdom whose prince she is meant to be marrying. Her big problem is that she has lots and lots and lots of poorly-trained magic, which is illegal.
Amaranthine (Mare), the Rebellious Princess, is mad about being a princess and does not care about royalty or ruling or responsibilities; she cares only about horses! Mare does sneak out of the castle on the regular with her One Friend to find out what's going on with the illegal magic-users in town, but since she seems to have one (1) contact in the city (how she made this contact? unclear) and no (0) highly-placed contacts in the castle to pass along the information that she gains from her one (1) contact in the city, it's difficult to tell how this got started or why she believes it's effective.
(It's also a bit difficult to tell what's actually going on in the city, why it's so easy for Mare and her One Friend to wander in and out of secret magic-user strongholds, and why there are only six people involved in the political life of the kingdom. Worldbuilding and political intrigue is not necessarily the book's strong suit.)
So, I mean, Mare is very much a YA heroine in the classic vein, but she and her "ugh, the court, the politics, THERE IS CLEARLY NO REASON FOR ME TO PAY ATTENTION TO ANY OF THESE LOSERS [flips table]" and her initial resentment of Denna's respectable princesshood would I think have worked better for me if she was a stablehand or something; these days I prefer my princesses with a little more self-awareness and sense of duty.
That said, though neither Denna nor Mare really demonstrate overwhelming amounts of tactical awareness or strategic intelligence, their romance is a perfectly cute iteration of Horse Girl Falls For Nerd Girl and I'm very glad that the genre of Tropey YA Fantasy With Paper-Thin Worldbuilding and Magical Princesses Metaphorically Singing "I Want" Songs - a perfectly respectable genre which every so often is still exactly the genre I want to read! - has gotten a little bit gayer.
(But if you want really good lesbian princesses, may I recommend Erin Bow's The Scorpion Rules? The baby royals are responsible AND there are asshole goats!)
no subject
Date: 2017-04-04 01:26 am (UTC). . . this is a thing?
no subject
Date: 2017-04-04 01:33 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2017-04-04 01:36 am (UTC)I could have been out of the lesbian princess loop!
no subject
Date: 2017-04-04 02:11 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2017-04-04 02:07 am (UTC)at last, my true reading niche
no subject
Date: 2017-04-04 02:12 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2017-04-04 02:30 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2017-04-04 02:34 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2017-04-04 02:49 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2017-04-04 03:52 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2017-04-06 03:31 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2017-04-04 02:25 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2017-04-04 02:28 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2017-04-04 03:37 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2017-04-04 05:07 am (UTC)Or a gay-up, honest portrayal, as the case may be.
no subject
Date: 2017-04-04 01:23 pm (UTC)I think the passage where they almost get killed by an assassin and she thinks "half fainting away was probably covered in one of [Denna's] handbooks on how to be a proper lady" was the point at which I nearly gave up and punted the book across the room.
no subject
Date: 2017-04-06 03:29 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2017-04-06 05:18 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2017-04-06 03:26 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2017-04-06 05:16 am (UTC)(I got the sense that her only goal was "I DO WHAT I WANT, WHEN I WANT (with horses, I guess)" but nothing more concrete than that.)
no subject
Date: 2017-04-04 04:45 am (UTC)Marathoned Nirvana in Fire last month and after utterly breaking me it reverted me to my default settings, i.e. responsible royals who actually do stuff are the best royals.
no subject
Date: 2017-04-06 03:29 am (UTC)So many people have broken their hearts over Nirvana in Fire that I feel it is only a matter of time probably before I do the same ...
no subject
Date: 2017-04-04 12:50 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2017-04-04 04:33 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2017-04-06 03:29 am (UTC)