(no subject)
Feb. 13th, 2022 09:22 pm![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
A few weeks ago, I read Michael Gilbert's Death in Captivity, but I couldn't post about it until now because I was immediately after consumed with the urge to make
genarti watch The Great Escape with me and we didn't finish that until last night, and I don't know how to talk about Death in Captivity except at least somewhat in context of The Great Escape because that film has been burned into my brain and heart since I was ten.
...ANYWAY.
Death in Captivity is a mystery, of sorts, set in a POW camp in Italy; the British officers in the camp are attempting construction of an escape tunnel, on the understanding that a.) escape is their duty generally but also b.) an Allied invasion of Italy is imminent and there are a variety of scenarios for what will happen to the POW camps once that happens, none of which are great.
Unfortunately, they have just found a dead body in their half-completed tunnel -- a Greek POW that nobody liked and that everyone thought was a plant or a spy -- which provides some conundrums, since the Italian officers running the camp will surely notice that someone's missing, which means they have to provide a plausible explanation for his death without giving away their escape tunnel. Eventually the protagonist, a quiet intellectual POW, gets dispatched to do some sleuthing to answer some key tunnel- and informer-related questions, and ends up investigating the murder more or less on the side; it's not anyone's first concern, except inasmuch as it relates to the safety of the tunnel and the escape.
It's a really fascinating sort of sideways slant on the concept of the murder mystery, and it's also a really compelling portrayal of a POW camp. (Michael Gilbert himself was a POW, and did escape from a camp on the eve of the Allied invasion of Italy, along with two friends to whom he dedicated the book -- an earned self-insert if any fictional detective ever was.) As aforementioned, I've seen The Great Escape many times and when you have a story about a lot of people in a POW camp digging a tunnel in an attempt to get as many people out as possible it's very difficult not to play compare/contrast, but the most interesting distinction for me is the fact that in The Great Escape they're all there in that particular camp because they are Dedicated Escapers: everyone in that film absolutely committed to escaping, not just because it's their duty but because they, personally, hate being behind bars and feel a compulsion to Get Out regardless of the personal risk. There's no mistrust or worry that any of them aren't sufficiently behind the project -- in fact the challenges go the other way around, when people are Too desperate to escape and get into trouble as a result.
In Death in Captivity, on the other hand, a solid contingent of the POWs aren't particularly excited about the prospect of risking their lives in an escape attempt. Gilbert has a really deft and sympathetic hand with the various human ways that people find to pass the time in captivity, many of which have nothing to do with escape at all (the camp theater troupe's production of The Barretts of Wimpole Street provides a major comic subplot) and also the various small tensions that arise as people's coping mechanisms inevitably come into conflict: like, on the one hand, yes, it's very worthy of those slightly obsessive guys in the hut over there to be digging that tunnel all day and night, and on the other hand, they stole our roulette board to prop the tunnel up?! Without asking?!? We were using that?!?
(Another thing that really struck me is after the protagonist escapes with his two friends and has to spend months getting through the Alps, and thinks sort of wistfully that he thought their friendship would if anything become closer at this point but in fact under the constant stress and tension they are all just getting on each other's nerves ALL THE TIME.
Now, admittedly, this is because one of the trio is a spy and a murderer and the protagonist knows it, and the fact that he hasn't admitted it in narration or to his other friend at this point does feel a little bit of a narrative cheat, but it still hit me! Survival is hard, and pack bonds are harder; you can rely on and trust someone with your life and it's still sometimes hard to forgive them for getting lost and being annoying about it.
Anyway. I liked it very much; in other news The Great Escape remains a fantastic movie.
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
...ANYWAY.
Death in Captivity is a mystery, of sorts, set in a POW camp in Italy; the British officers in the camp are attempting construction of an escape tunnel, on the understanding that a.) escape is their duty generally but also b.) an Allied invasion of Italy is imminent and there are a variety of scenarios for what will happen to the POW camps once that happens, none of which are great.
Unfortunately, they have just found a dead body in their half-completed tunnel -- a Greek POW that nobody liked and that everyone thought was a plant or a spy -- which provides some conundrums, since the Italian officers running the camp will surely notice that someone's missing, which means they have to provide a plausible explanation for his death without giving away their escape tunnel. Eventually the protagonist, a quiet intellectual POW, gets dispatched to do some sleuthing to answer some key tunnel- and informer-related questions, and ends up investigating the murder more or less on the side; it's not anyone's first concern, except inasmuch as it relates to the safety of the tunnel and the escape.
It's a really fascinating sort of sideways slant on the concept of the murder mystery, and it's also a really compelling portrayal of a POW camp. (Michael Gilbert himself was a POW, and did escape from a camp on the eve of the Allied invasion of Italy, along with two friends to whom he dedicated the book -- an earned self-insert if any fictional detective ever was.) As aforementioned, I've seen The Great Escape many times and when you have a story about a lot of people in a POW camp digging a tunnel in an attempt to get as many people out as possible it's very difficult not to play compare/contrast, but the most interesting distinction for me is the fact that in The Great Escape they're all there in that particular camp because they are Dedicated Escapers: everyone in that film absolutely committed to escaping, not just because it's their duty but because they, personally, hate being behind bars and feel a compulsion to Get Out regardless of the personal risk. There's no mistrust or worry that any of them aren't sufficiently behind the project -- in fact the challenges go the other way around, when people are Too desperate to escape and get into trouble as a result.
In Death in Captivity, on the other hand, a solid contingent of the POWs aren't particularly excited about the prospect of risking their lives in an escape attempt. Gilbert has a really deft and sympathetic hand with the various human ways that people find to pass the time in captivity, many of which have nothing to do with escape at all (the camp theater troupe's production of The Barretts of Wimpole Street provides a major comic subplot) and also the various small tensions that arise as people's coping mechanisms inevitably come into conflict: like, on the one hand, yes, it's very worthy of those slightly obsessive guys in the hut over there to be digging that tunnel all day and night, and on the other hand, they stole our roulette board to prop the tunnel up?! Without asking?!? We were using that?!?
(Another thing that really struck me is after the protagonist escapes with his two friends and has to spend months getting through the Alps, and thinks sort of wistfully that he thought their friendship would if anything become closer at this point but in fact under the constant stress and tension they are all just getting on each other's nerves ALL THE TIME.
Now, admittedly, this is because one of the trio is a spy and a murderer and the protagonist knows it, and the fact that he hasn't admitted it in narration or to his other friend at this point does feel a little bit of a narrative cheat, but it still hit me! Survival is hard, and pack bonds are harder; you can rely on and trust someone with your life and it's still sometimes hard to forgive them for getting lost and being annoying about it.
Anyway. I liked it very much; in other news The Great Escape remains a fantastic movie.
no subject
Date: 2022-02-14 03:42 am (UTC)I have no idea why I haven't read this book, but I should read this book. Thank you!
(How have I read other books by the same author? I bet they were in the house when I was growing up. I just bounced this title off my mother and she said approvingly, "Gilbert is always good!")
Gilbert has a really deft and sympathetic hand with the various human ways that people find to pass the time in captivity, many of which have nothing to do with escape at all
I highly recommend The Captive Heart (1946), the first and still to date only movie set in a POW camp I have seen where no one escapes except in the very technical sense of getting one person legally repatriated under another's name.
[edit] My brain has nevertheless seen fit to start jingling with "If I get to the coast, I will post you a letter / And Colditz can go to hell!"
no subject
Date: 2022-02-16 03:51 am (UTC)The Captive Heart has been on my list since first you posted about it, but thank you for the timely reminder now that I'm in a POW camp spiral because now it is moving right up towards the top!
no subject
Date: 2022-02-16 03:54 am (UTC)That's the Gilbert I have definitely read! I have also read at least one other Inspector Hazlerigg novel and am trying to remember which.
The Captive Heart has been on my list since first you posted about it, but thank you for the timely reminder now that I'm in a POW camp spiral because now it is moving right up towards the top!
w00t!
(If you write the POW camp theatrical romance before me and
no subject
Date: 2022-02-24 02:52 am (UTC)It's great!
no subject
Date: 2022-02-14 04:04 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2022-02-16 03:56 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2022-02-14 04:39 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2022-02-16 03:56 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2022-02-14 06:31 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2022-02-14 07:23 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2022-02-14 07:36 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2022-02-16 03:59 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2022-02-16 04:22 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2022-02-14 08:58 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2022-02-16 03:59 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2022-02-16 06:39 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2022-02-14 10:40 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2022-02-16 04:01 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2022-02-16 07:55 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2022-02-14 11:25 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2022-02-15 05:23 am (UTC)Sold!
no subject
Date: 2022-02-15 10:19 am (UTC)While I'm at it, another mystery writer of similar vintage you might enjoy is the un-googleable Mary Kelly (some of the ones I have in mind are Dead Corse, The Spoilt Kill, The Twenty-Fifth Hour etc.). Kind of hard to describe but very strong character and setting, dark in the sense of "characters in untenable situations" as opposed to gore/violence, very well-written.
no subject
Date: 2022-02-16 04:02 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2022-02-14 04:20 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2022-02-16 04:02 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2022-02-14 04:25 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2022-02-16 04:04 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2022-02-16 03:06 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2022-02-14 04:55 pm (UTC)Interesting. My acquaintance with Gilbert comes almost entirely by way of his short fiction, specifically a series featuring a certain Mr. Calder and Mr. Behrens, who (depending on the particular time and place) are either in the service of or retired from British Intelligence, and thereby find themselves called upon to unravel mysterious plots and/or foil assorted acts of villainy, usually with a degree of understated subtlety. (One should not, however, underestimate these gentlemen, who are perfectly capable of the sternest possible measures should such prove necessary.) As a duo, these two occupy a space roughly in the middle of a triangle whose points consist of James Bond, Emma Peel & John Steed, and George Smiley.
A number of their adventures are collected in a book titled as given above, though there were - as I recall - a number of additional stories postdating the collection, which I read mostly in Ellery Queen's Mystery Magazine.
no subject
Date: 2022-02-16 04:04 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2022-02-14 06:49 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2022-02-16 04:07 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2022-02-17 02:42 am (UTC)The Wooden Horse (1950) is the fictionalization of an earlier real-life tunnel escape from Stalag Luft III and I keep meaning to read the memoirs of two of the three men involved, because I'm curious about the different perspectives. The Colditz Story (1955) is based on the memoir of the same name by Pat Reid which is one of
no subject
Date: 2022-02-14 09:09 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2022-02-16 04:08 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2022-02-16 09:17 am (UTC)Death Has Deep Roots is refreshingly anti-slut shaming, but also anti denial of platonic relationships and I love it. The narrative doesn't shame the heroine for having had sex, or act as though her other important relationship with a man must have been sexual, and these two things can coexist.
no subject
Date: 2022-02-14 10:38 pm (UTC)I didn't actually watch The Great Escape until relatively recently, but for some reason my middle school library had a first-edition hardcover of the book on the shelves, and I read that until I had it practically memorized.
no subject
Date: 2022-02-14 11:08 pm (UTC)* An M&S Christmas compendium with a couple of other WWII classics if memory serves.
no subject
Date: 2022-02-15 05:17 am (UTC)I didn't remember until this sub-thread that I have also read The Great Escape, although like
no subject
Date: 2022-02-16 04:09 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2022-02-15 02:55 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2022-02-16 04:10 am (UTC)