(no subject)
Feb. 25th, 2023 11:51 amWe watched "The Prince," a filmed play airing on nebula.tv, because my friend kept getting incredibly targeted advertisements announcing that the show was full of "sword fighting, lesbianism, Hamlet, and disappointed parents."
All of this is true but also very funny as an advertising ploy because the entire first act is a Rosencrantz-and-Guildensternish riff on Henry IV: Part 1. "This is great," we said, during intermission, "we are having a wonderful time, but was Hamlet a lie? Did they think that Henry IV was not popular enough to be worth advertising or did they just get their H-plays mixed up?"
Anyway: The Prince is a Rosencrantz-and-Guildensternish riff on Henry IV: Part I, in which two trans women trapped in the bit parts attempt to stumble their way through the background of the play to extratheatrical freedom, struggling along the way with how much they can or should attempt to rescue the main players from the roles in which they are likewise trapped (with a heavy emphasis on gender and masculinity). The broader metaphor is not necessarily subtle but it's extremely well done -- Abigail Thorn, the author, has a great ear for Shakespearian rhythm and I often had a truly difficult time distinguishing the exact moments where the play slides back off Shakespeare's tracks and onto its own (though it's also been a long time since I've encountered a Henry IV so my memory for what exactly happens in it is not as clear.) And whenever the show did jump onto scenes/monologues/etc that I knew well, I was consistently impressed with the way that it situated and reframed them within its particular contexts to make them its own; it's the kind of riff you can only do when you're really deeply immersed in a text, with enough knowledge and affection to claim full ownership of it.
This play has a really strong and compelling read on its two Harrys -- quite different from how I usually see them played but I thought it worked really well. (The Kate thread didn't work for me quite as well, and felt a little like it was falling back on easier tropes, but that may just be personal preference on Kates and Kate-and-Harrys.)
I also want to do a shout-out to the costuming, which used small details extremely well and was constantly changing in delightful ways.
You can watch a trailer for the show here -- I actually only just now watched it myself while writing this post and was kind of surprised at how extremely dramatic it was! The play is also funny ... there's a plot-significant Diet Coke bottle that was personally delightful to me ....
(Okay, one other small complaint -- there's a lot of thematic emphasis put on metered dialogue as representative of narrative constraint and Shakespeare does not always use metered dialogue! Sometimes his characters talk in prose! It's fine, I trust that Abigail Thorn knows this too and is choosing to ignore it to make her point, but the nits gotta be picked.)
All of this is true but also very funny as an advertising ploy because the entire first act is a Rosencrantz-and-Guildensternish riff on Henry IV: Part 1. "This is great," we said, during intermission, "we are having a wonderful time, but was Hamlet a lie? Did they think that Henry IV was not popular enough to be worth advertising or did they just get their H-plays mixed up?"
Anyway: The Prince is a Rosencrantz-and-Guildensternish riff on Henry IV: Part I, in which two trans women trapped in the bit parts attempt to stumble their way through the background of the play to extratheatrical freedom, struggling along the way with how much they can or should attempt to rescue the main players from the roles in which they are likewise trapped (with a heavy emphasis on gender and masculinity). The broader metaphor is not necessarily subtle but it's extremely well done -- Abigail Thorn, the author, has a great ear for Shakespearian rhythm and I often had a truly difficult time distinguishing the exact moments where the play slides back off Shakespeare's tracks and onto its own (though it's also been a long time since I've encountered a Henry IV so my memory for what exactly happens in it is not as clear.) And whenever the show did jump onto scenes/monologues/etc that I knew well, I was consistently impressed with the way that it situated and reframed them within its particular contexts to make them its own; it's the kind of riff you can only do when you're really deeply immersed in a text, with enough knowledge and affection to claim full ownership of it.
This play has a really strong and compelling read on its two Harrys -- quite different from how I usually see them played but I thought it worked really well. (The Kate thread didn't work for me quite as well, and felt a little like it was falling back on easier tropes, but that may just be personal preference on Kates and Kate-and-Harrys.)
I also want to do a shout-out to the costuming, which used small details extremely well and was constantly changing in delightful ways.
You can watch a trailer for the show here -- I actually only just now watched it myself while writing this post and was kind of surprised at how extremely dramatic it was! The play is also funny ... there's a plot-significant Diet Coke bottle that was personally delightful to me ....
(Okay, one other small complaint -- there's a lot of thematic emphasis put on metered dialogue as representative of narrative constraint and Shakespeare does not always use metered dialogue! Sometimes his characters talk in prose! It's fine, I trust that Abigail Thorn knows this too and is choosing to ignore it to make her point, but the nits gotta be picked.)
no subject
Date: 2023-02-25 06:30 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2023-02-25 07:04 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2023-02-25 07:07 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2023-02-25 08:40 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2023-02-25 07:16 pm (UTC)How so?
no subject
Date: 2023-02-25 09:00 pm (UTC)(Also, the play ships it. This isn't new, obviously people do ship it, but it's very pointed!)
no subject
Date: 2023-02-25 11:33 pm (UTC)That sounds great.
no subject
Date: 2023-02-27 04:08 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2023-03-04 03:06 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2023-02-25 08:17 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2023-02-25 09:01 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2023-02-26 01:00 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2023-03-04 03:06 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2023-02-26 02:36 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2023-02-28 03:29 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2023-03-04 03:09 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2023-03-06 06:15 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2023-03-04 03:07 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2023-02-28 01:55 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2023-03-04 03:09 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2023-03-06 01:05 am (UTC)