(no subject)
Jun. 7th, 2008 01:22 pmOkay, this was and is going to be a booklogging post, but first I have to express my glee over BSG - I think this may have beaten out Faith as my favorite episode this season, in part, I admit, because I am a sucker for hilarity and hilarious awkward. The dialogue was definitely the snappiest it's been all season, I think - dude, Gaius Baltar was on tonight. Trying to bond with the Hybrid! Preaching to the Centurions just for the lulz! Also, Helo and the Eights (Roslin: "You are not married to the entire production line!" Helo: "OR MAYBE I AM!") struck me as funny, because I am kind of a bad person, but also painful and something that needed to be done. I'm always fascinated when they explore the complexities of just what it means to be that close to a Cylon, and the individual identity thing, and yeah. D'Anna: also fabulous, I had forgotten how much so; I really liked the way they explored Roslin's development, I loved her patching up Gaius, and Roslin/Adama at the end was kind of the most awesome thing imaginable and I'm not even a gigantic 'shipper. It is episodes like this that get me excited about the show.
And now back to our regularly scheduled programming. I have been trying to get myself into the habit of reading more nonfiction now that I am not having regularly scheduled learnings, so I picked up Melanie Rehak's Girl Sleuth: Nancy Drew and the Women Who Created Her. That makes two nonfiction books for this year! . . . both of which were in fact nonfiction about the production of fiction, but, you know, baby steps. Anyways, I devoured Nancy Drew when I was little (and 'fess up, guys, I know at least some of you did too) and I remember only gradually figuring out that Carolyn Keene was not real - mostly when I tried doing the math and realized she would have had to be writing constantly from the 1930s to the 1990s - so the most interesting part for me was reading about the development of the ghostwriting process, the struggles over the character between ghostwriters and editor, and the creative syndicate's attempts to keep up the illusion that there was a real, consistent Carolyn Keene. As for the rest, I would have liked a less biography and more analysis of the changes in the books over the decades (glaring omission: the Nancy Drew/Hardy Boys crossovers!) but it was a pretty interesting look at the publishing process and collective creation of a character.
Also, now that I have finished all the nonfiction books in my to-read pile, if you have any nonfiction book recs to throw at me I would appreciate it!
And now back to our regularly scheduled programming. I have been trying to get myself into the habit of reading more nonfiction now that I am not having regularly scheduled learnings, so I picked up Melanie Rehak's Girl Sleuth: Nancy Drew and the Women Who Created Her. That makes two nonfiction books for this year! . . . both of which were in fact nonfiction about the production of fiction, but, you know, baby steps. Anyways, I devoured Nancy Drew when I was little (and 'fess up, guys, I know at least some of you did too) and I remember only gradually figuring out that Carolyn Keene was not real - mostly when I tried doing the math and realized she would have had to be writing constantly from the 1930s to the 1990s - so the most interesting part for me was reading about the development of the ghostwriting process, the struggles over the character between ghostwriters and editor, and the creative syndicate's attempts to keep up the illusion that there was a real, consistent Carolyn Keene. As for the rest, I would have liked a less biography and more analysis of the changes in the books over the decades (glaring omission: the Nancy Drew/Hardy Boys crossovers!) but it was a pretty interesting look at the publishing process and collective creation of a character.
Also, now that I have finished all the nonfiction books in my to-read pile, if you have any nonfiction book recs to throw at me I would appreciate it!
no subject
Date: 2008-06-08 03:10 am (UTC)Okay that's all I've go for now, I might have more later and I do love the Mallorys so much.
no subject
Date: 2008-06-08 03:14 am (UTC)(Me toooo. I think as soon as I go home I'm going to have to reread Deep Secret - after I read House of Many Ways, of course!)
no subject
Date: 2008-06-09 04:56 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-06-09 04:59 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-06-09 02:28 am (UTC)As for nonfiction:
Reenchantment: Tibetan Buddhism Comes to the West, by Jeffrey Paine. I rec this one because it is as much a look at a marketing campaign as a commentary on Tibetan Buddhism and geopolitical issues -- it's fascinating.
Maps and Legends -- Micahel Chabon. Speaks for itself, rather, but I am loving reading it in bits and pieces as I get the time -- it's good for that.
Strapless: John Singer Sargent and the Fall of Madame X, by Deborah Davis. I don't know much about art history, and it was a really engaging read -- and it's about a period of time in France that you have exhibited minor amounts of interest in before. Ahem.
Chronicles. Bob Dylan. I like his prose.
no subject
Date: 2008-06-09 02:35 am (UTC)And ooh! *adds to list* Maps and Legends I had already been planning to acquire, but these all look extremely interesting - especially Strapless. (Due to my just minor amounts of interest. Yes. >.>)
no subject
Date: 2008-06-09 09:17 pm (UTC)(Although, entertainingly, a few months before I read it I reread the very first Nancy Drew book! And spent the entire time giggling at how horribly bad it was. Oh well.)
no subject
Date: 2008-06-10 03:27 am (UTC)(Yeah, part of me kind of wants to reread Nancy Drew books now, just to see! And the other part is like NO BAD IDEA. CHERISH YOUR MEMORIES.)
no subject
Date: 2008-06-10 01:39 pm (UTC)And, heck, the current Nancy Drew stuff. Those were still coming out last I checked...
(*giggles* It's... kind of fun? And, I mean, it's possible that some of the later ones are better. I dunno. But reading the first one, it was just... well, the prose was kind of awful, but the social class stuff was really fascinating. In an entitlement trainwreck way, but still.)
no subject
Date: 2008-06-10 06:08 pm (UTC)And yes, I think you're right! Though I loved the old ones best when I was little. The new ones kind of made me squint and go "that's not Nancy!"
(Ohhhh yes. *rueful* - That was the other interesting thing, when the book kept talking about how Mildred Wirt would try and jazz up her writing with fany verbs, and Harriet Stratemeyer would be like "DUMB IT DOWN. STUPID IT UP MORE". But yeah, the whole social class thing is especially interesting when you consider it was the Depression era when they became really popular. Everyone was poor!)
no subject
Date: 2008-06-10 03:02 am (UTC)I find this to be a ridiculous coincidence.
-TL (not Finn. Who doesn't read Nancy Drew. Ew, girls.)
no subject
Date: 2008-06-10 03:31 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-06-10 01:39 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-06-10 08:22 pm (UTC)