(no subject)
Aug. 7th, 2019 12:00 am![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
I read Stacy Schiff's The Witches: Salem, 1692 not because I'm particularly interested in the Salem witch trials, but because I liked her nonfiction prose style in the Cleopatra biography she wrote well enough that I was interested in whatever subject she chose to write about.
I felt like I had a fairly reasonable grasp on the key events going in, both from reading some books as a kid and from cultural osmosis -- hysterical teens, Tituba, stressed-out Puritans, distressed accused grandmothers, "more weight!", Cotton Mather sticking his nose in every which way -- and most of the things I vaguely remembered did indeed turn out to be accurate, though I appreciated in general Schiff's strict adherence to facts rather than speculation, and careful attention to gaps in the historical record. I also appreciated the breadth of her scope, and how she places the witchcraft scare in context; she draws a detailed portrait of the pre-existing stressors and small-town politics of Salem Village (a town so rancorous that they kicked out three ministers in ten years, one of whom ended up accused of witchcraft despite living an entire state away, and nearby Actual Salem Town wrote to them multiple times in the pre-witchcraft years to be like "PLEASE STOP ASKING US TO MEDIATE YOUR ARGUMENTS, WE'RE TIRED AND WE DON'T CARE") but also of the broader context and how Massachusetts politics may have influenced the reaction to the crisis. (It is notable -- a fact I did not know -- that the witchcraft trials somehow mysteriously slowed their roll after the governor's wife was accused.)
Maybe most of all I liked how she wrote about the little we know of the aftermath -- it's horrible but fascinating to think about all the people who accused each other at the height of the crisis and then had to spend their ENTIRE LIVES running into each other awkwardly at the store.
Schiff is particularly interested in the Nurse clan, and successfully managed to get me interested in them as well; Rebecca Nurse was an apparently much-beloved seventy-something great-grandmother whose family (unlike that of most other victims) unilaterally rallied around her when she and her sisters were accused of witchcraft and immediately started a HOW DARE YOU ACCUSE GRANDMA petition. The jury originally acquitted her! The judges were like "ummm maybe rethink that," and alas, Rebecca Nurse was executed, along with her sister, Mary Esty, who wrote a very polite letter to the judges asking that they perhaps reconsider executing any more witches after her.
Unsurprisingly, the Nurse family spent the next decade Still Mad About Grandma (And Great-Aunt Mary). They collectively refused to attend church until Samuel Parris the town minister (a prosecutor in the trials and related to several accusers) publicly apologized, which he refused to do for years, and the feud went on until finally it resulted in Parris getting forced out of his position; score one for the Nurse clan. On the other hand, the next minister reorganized church seating arrangements so that they had to sit next to the other family that accused Grandma of being a witch. So it goes. I was describing this to
attractivegeekery and
genarti and they pitched me the idea of a black comedy show about small-town sniping in seventeenth-century Puritan America, in which it is only gradually revealed that the small town is Salem and the reason Ann and Mary keep getting into fights over floral arrangements on the church beautification committee is Still Because Of That Time Grandma Was Executed For Witchcraft.
All that said, I have one major complaint about the book, and that is that for all her broad scope, Schiff somehow completely avoids some topics that I think are really quite relevant, like, for example, slavery in Puritan America. We spend a little time on Tituba; it's impossible, in writing a book on the Salem witch trials, not to spend a little time on Tituba; I still have no idea how common or uncommon it was for a man like Samuel Parris to have slaves, what their position and status would have been in Salem, and what context they themselves might bring to the witch trials. Similarly, Schiff spends a fair amount of time on the fact that the colonists lived in fear of attacks from the local tribes, and no time at all using her undeniably clever prose to contextualize or complicate Puritan Ideas about Indians.
We do, however, get some perspectives from the local Quakers. They appear to have spent the entire time period of the Salem Witch Trials filled with a deep sense of schadenfreude, and I think anyone who read The Witch of Blackbird Pond would agree that honestly that seems fair.
I felt like I had a fairly reasonable grasp on the key events going in, both from reading some books as a kid and from cultural osmosis -- hysterical teens, Tituba, stressed-out Puritans, distressed accused grandmothers, "more weight!", Cotton Mather sticking his nose in every which way -- and most of the things I vaguely remembered did indeed turn out to be accurate, though I appreciated in general Schiff's strict adherence to facts rather than speculation, and careful attention to gaps in the historical record. I also appreciated the breadth of her scope, and how she places the witchcraft scare in context; she draws a detailed portrait of the pre-existing stressors and small-town politics of Salem Village (a town so rancorous that they kicked out three ministers in ten years, one of whom ended up accused of witchcraft despite living an entire state away, and nearby Actual Salem Town wrote to them multiple times in the pre-witchcraft years to be like "PLEASE STOP ASKING US TO MEDIATE YOUR ARGUMENTS, WE'RE TIRED AND WE DON'T CARE") but also of the broader context and how Massachusetts politics may have influenced the reaction to the crisis. (It is notable -- a fact I did not know -- that the witchcraft trials somehow mysteriously slowed their roll after the governor's wife was accused.)
Maybe most of all I liked how she wrote about the little we know of the aftermath -- it's horrible but fascinating to think about all the people who accused each other at the height of the crisis and then had to spend their ENTIRE LIVES running into each other awkwardly at the store.
Schiff is particularly interested in the Nurse clan, and successfully managed to get me interested in them as well; Rebecca Nurse was an apparently much-beloved seventy-something great-grandmother whose family (unlike that of most other victims) unilaterally rallied around her when she and her sisters were accused of witchcraft and immediately started a HOW DARE YOU ACCUSE GRANDMA petition. The jury originally acquitted her! The judges were like "ummm maybe rethink that," and alas, Rebecca Nurse was executed, along with her sister, Mary Esty, who wrote a very polite letter to the judges asking that they perhaps reconsider executing any more witches after her.
Unsurprisingly, the Nurse family spent the next decade Still Mad About Grandma (And Great-Aunt Mary). They collectively refused to attend church until Samuel Parris the town minister (a prosecutor in the trials and related to several accusers) publicly apologized, which he refused to do for years, and the feud went on until finally it resulted in Parris getting forced out of his position; score one for the Nurse clan. On the other hand, the next minister reorganized church seating arrangements so that they had to sit next to the other family that accused Grandma of being a witch. So it goes. I was describing this to
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
All that said, I have one major complaint about the book, and that is that for all her broad scope, Schiff somehow completely avoids some topics that I think are really quite relevant, like, for example, slavery in Puritan America. We spend a little time on Tituba; it's impossible, in writing a book on the Salem witch trials, not to spend a little time on Tituba; I still have no idea how common or uncommon it was for a man like Samuel Parris to have slaves, what their position and status would have been in Salem, and what context they themselves might bring to the witch trials. Similarly, Schiff spends a fair amount of time on the fact that the colonists lived in fear of attacks from the local tribes, and no time at all using her undeniably clever prose to contextualize or complicate Puritan Ideas about Indians.
We do, however, get some perspectives from the local Quakers. They appear to have spent the entire time period of the Salem Witch Trials filled with a deep sense of schadenfreude, and I think anyone who read The Witch of Blackbird Pond would agree that honestly that seems fair.
no subject
Date: 2019-08-07 12:18 pm (UTC)I also have never seen anyone write or depict the aftermath before, which is kind of wild, when you think about it -- I feel like accounts tend to close with "they stopped hanging witches and the craze ended," but nothing ends when you're all still living in the same small village. And some people did leave, and some people spent the next twenty years embroiled in lawsuits, and some people stayed and made awkward public apologies from the pulpit ten years later -- I had forgotten that The Crucible ends, ahistorically, with two of the accusing girls running away to England, I suppose just because Miller couldn't get his mind around this very problem.
no subject
Date: 2019-08-07 07:34 pm (UTC)It's nuts! Especially the part where Nathaniel Hawthorne imported the blood-to-drink curse-death wholesale into the backstory of The House of the Seven Gables, so that I have twice told the story about
Thank you for sharing the poem; I like the demons you brought to your marriage.
Thank you.
-- I feel like accounts tend to close with "they stopped hanging witches and the craze ended," but nothing ends when you're all still living in the same small village.
Same. I really would love to see someone dramatize it. I don't know how you live with something like that in general and in particular I don't know how Puritan society/theology expected or directed you to.
I had forgotten that The Crucible ends, ahistorically, with two of the accusing girls running away to England, I suppose just because Miller couldn't get his mind around this very problem.
I knew The Crucible had historical issues, but I didn't remember that one. Narratively neater, but.
I keep thinking about the vagueness you mentioned about slaves in Salem Village; I don't have that information and I'd also really like to know. Much of what I know about Tituba is—at least the last time I checked—how much we don't know about her.
no subject
Date: 2019-08-08 12:12 am (UTC)Unsurprisingly it sounds like at least a few people decided that the aftermath of the witch trials was a good time to switch religions; the local Anglican churches seem to have gotten a little bit of a boost by comparison. One sort of imagines them putting up billboards advertising themselves as the Distinctly Less Murderous Church.
Same, and same. Schiff actually provides quite a lot of context on the Puritan habit of farming out their children to each other as servants, but very little on the slaves and other extracommunity members; surely some general information on the topic must exist, even if we don't know about Tituba in particular.
no subject
Date: 2019-08-08 12:27 am (UTC)...This could also be a big element in the TV show. I'm just saying. Anglicans: The Distinctly Less Murderous Church! Also Quaker Schadenfreude!
A TV series could also explore provide more context on Tituba - if she was still in Salem after the trials? I may have read somewhere that she was sold down to Barbados. But then again a TV show with flower arrangements doesn't need to adhere strictly to historical facts like whether or not Tituba remained in Salem...
no subject
Date: 2019-08-08 01:23 am (UTC)I don't think it's confirmed what happened to Tituba afterwards - we know Parris didn't bail her out of jail, and eventually he sold her to a mystery someone else who did, and that's all that we've got in the historical record, so the field is WIDE OPEN.
no subject
Date: 2019-08-08 01:46 am (UTC)I feel the Quaker should be an older woman who knew Mary Dyer personally, so her jokes have an edge.
no subject
Date: 2019-08-08 02:34 am (UTC)Oh, wow. I'm not surprised by that; it's painfully understandable; and yet it is also hilarious.
Schiff actually provides quite a lot of context on the Puritan habit of farming out their children to each other as servants
I know almost nothing about that. What an interesting interpretation of community service.
surely some general information on the topic must exist, even if we don't know about Tituba in particular.
Right! They owned people! We must have some idea of how that worked! (I've read a YA novel from the '50's about indentured servitude in Puritan communities. And that's more obscure to most people than slavery.)
[edit] BOOM.
[edit edit] This review of New England Bound is fascinating in its own right.